Herbert Smith Freehills to go live as partners vote through merger
Herbert Smith and Australia's Freehills are set to merge on 1 October after partners at both firms voted in favour of a union under the banner Herbert Smith Freehills. Voting on the tie-up closed this morning (28 June), with the firms now planning a full financial merger from the autumn.
June 28, 2012 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
Herbert Smith and Australia's Freehills are set to merge on 1 October after partners at both firms voted in favour of a union under the banner Herbert Smith Freehills.
Voting on the tie-up closed this morning (28 June), with the firms now planning a full financial merger from the autumn.
Herbert Smith managing partner David Willis and Freehills chief executive and managing partner Gavin Bell will become joint chief executives of the combined firm.
Herbert Smith senior partner Jonathan Scott will take up the role of senior partner at the merged firm, with Freehills chairman Mark Crean appointed as deputy senior partner.
Partners will share profits from day one of the merger; however, the two firms will operate with separate remuneration structures for the time being, with a separate vote to create a single structure for the whole firm expected at a later date.
The combined firm will boast revenues of around £770m and would rank 14th in the Am Law Global 100, based on the firms' respective 2010-11 revenues. It will have 2,800 lawyers, including 460 partners across 20 offices.
The new firm will be headed up by a management board and governance board, with Willis and Bell leading the management board alongside global practice heads and regional chiefs, who are yet to be confirmed.
Meanwhile, Scott will chair the governance board, which will consist of six elected partners from each respective firm, with the addition of external members a possibility in future.
Scott said: "The simple logic behind this deal is a response to what our clients are doing. We are looking to provide a service that can run both ends of a mandate. As clients move into higher risk jurisdictions they want to make sure they have got their lawyers with them who have experience in those regions and right now Asia-Pacific is at the heart of this.
"The depth of resource that this tie-up gives us coupled with a number of other areas of international expansion we have on the agenda right now in the US, Africa, Germany and Korea, positions us exceptionally well in the global market."
The move gifts Herbert Smith its first presence on the ground in Australia with offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Brisbane, while the firms will combine their one duplicate office in Singapore.
The top 10 UK firm has been in discussions with Freehills since the last quarter of 2011, with the union initially planned to go live on 1 July this year, tying it in with the Australian firm's financial year end. This was later pushed back due to the complexities of working out the deal.
Willis said: "We share with Freehills a strong belief that over the next few years the market for premium legal services will become increasingly dominated by a small number of truly global firms. This merger will therefore put us in a strong position to provide clients with the single global offering they increasingly demand."
Bell added: "The merger will give Herbert Smith Freehills the platform to become the leading global law firm across Asia Pacific, a region likely to see continued substantial growth and to become an increasingly important part of the global legal services market."
Confirmation of the tie-up makes Herbert Smith the latest UK firm to enter Australia after Linklaters sealed an exclusive alliance with Allens Arthur Robinson in April this year, while Ashurst and Blake Dawson combined their Asian operations and came together in Australia under the Ashurst banner on 1 March.
Market reaction to the merger
"I've always found it a slightly odd strategic deal for them to do. I suppose the justification for it is not the importance of Australia, but the critical mass it gives them firm in Asia, but people forget that Australia is still half a day's flight away from China. However, I rather admire them for going for a full profit share straightaway, I think that is very wise. For Freehills it also gives them access to a global platform that they didn't previously have."
Magic circle partner
"There are a number of partners in London who opposed the deal right from the outset. Diluting partner profits through full financial integration with an Australian firm was never going to go down well. However, the opportunity to share costs for a New York launch that is inevitably going to cost a fortune could be a good thing for the firms, as they both need the US platform."
London recruiter
"It's a brave move and I wish them luck. They have been on a bit of a downward spiral of late and it could be a game-changer for them. A tie-up with an Australian firm will enhance Asia for them and I think this is all part of them trying to create a different image. We have pursued a three-legged approach of Europe, Asia and the US, so I wouldn't be surprised if they look to do another deal in due time, but this depends on what they are after."
Magic circle corporate partner
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCMS Targets Mauritian Investment Market with Local Boutique Partnership
3 minute readCharles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250