Partners say City firms are out of the dark ages on flexi-working
The overwhelming majority of partners believe law firms must allow both partners and associates to work flexibly, despite acknowledging the difficulties it can cause in terms of career progression. Legal Week's latest Big Question survey found almost half of the 140 respondents said it was essential for firms to offer flexible working opportunities to partners and associates, with a further 36% believing it to be 'very important' for partners, rising to 37% for associates.
July 05, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
The overwhelming majority of partners believe law firms must allow both partners and associates to work flexibly, despite acknowledging the difficulties it can cause in terms of career progression.
Legal Week's latest Big Question survey found almost half of the 140 respondents said it was essential for firms to offer flexible working opportunities to partners and associates, with a further 36% believing it to be 'very important' for partners, rising to 37% for associates.
The research found that despite firms paying increasing attention to flexible working and other measures to boost diversity, the reality at firms still lags behind perception. In total, 75% of respondents said their firms offered flexible working options for partners, with this figure rising marginally to 76% for associates.
Those taking part in the survey had mixed feelings about the reaction of clients to partners working flexibly. Nearly half (43%) said clients had issues with the idea, with 40% saying they were 'rarely' supportive of such moves and 3% saying that clients 'actively disapprove'.
In contrast, a similar percentage (43%) said clients were 'very' supportive of partners working flexibly, with a further 14% saying clients were 'completely' supportive of the idea.
Slaughter and May corporate partner Nilufer von Bismarck (pictured) commented: "Flexible working is often difficult to implement on transactional work, as deals usually have a momentum and flow, which makes flexible working awkward from the clients' perspective.
"I don't see that this is likely to change unless there is a radical change in client expectations of service. Some types of non-transactional work and support work do, however, lend themselves to more flexible working arrangements."
Asked what the biggest hindrances to wider adoption of flexible working at law firms were, just less than 40% of respondents said the workloads and timescales of many types of transactional work do not allow it, with 31% saying there is a stigma attached to it that prevents people from asking.
Roughly 21% said management do not like it, compared with only 8% putting lack of support from clients as the key problem.
Given the challenges, only 22% said flexible working would not affect an associate's chances of making partner. The largest group of respondents (36%) said it would affect chances 'a little', 22% said it would affect it 'a lot', 14% said it would be a 'serious hindrance' and 5% stated that flexible workers 'cannot make partner'.
Olswang real estate finance partner Eleni Skordaki said: "The general understanding is that senior associates who are talented and motivated would not be held back by any flexible working requirements. The interesting question is whether a person's need for flexible working arrangements could make that person's talent invisible.
"I believe, and certainly hope, that this would not be the case in any serious, ambitious law firm that respects its clients and people. Flexible working arrangements are now a very established part of what law firms offer."
Macfarlanes corporate partner Nicola Richards, who is responsible for the firm's diversity efforts, commented: "Law firms realise that if they want to attract and retain the best talent, they need to be flexible. There has been a marked change in attitude over the past few years, as the availability of technology has made seamless flexible working a real possibility.
"There should be more women partners, who will be great role models for younger women entering the profession, and more senior women partners in management roles at law firms."
Growing numbers of law firms have been taking steps to increase the number of women in their partnerships, including efforts to increase take-up of flexible working.
Firms making efforts in this area include Ashurst, which last summer unveiled a flexible working scheme for equity partners that allowed them to keep their position on the lockstep while being remunerated on a pro rata basis.
Partners on flexible working
- 75% of respondents' firms offer flexible working for partners
- 57% say clients are either completely or very supportive of partners working flexibly
- 43% say it is 'essential' for modern law firms to offer flexible working
- 5% believe flexible workers cannot make partner
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250