Weil Gotshal's Lehman bill reaches $442m, final fee application reveals
Weil Gotshal & Manges has racked up roughly $442m (£285m) in fees and expenses representing the bankrupt estate of Lehman Brothers over the past three-and-a-half years, according to the final fee request submitted in connection with the firm's work on the case, reports The Am Law Daily. Weil's final fee application shows that the firm has generated nearly $431.6m (£279m) in fees for professional services rendered and $11.1m (£7.2m) in expenses for its efforts during the massive Chapter 11 case - the largest in US history.
July 09, 2012 at 05:49 AM
3 minute read
Weil Gotshal & Manges has racked up roughly $442m (£285m) in fees and expenses representing the bankrupt estate of Lehman Brothers over the past three-and-a-half years, according to the final fee request submitted in connection with the firm's work on the case, reports The Am Law Daily.
Weil's final fee application shows that the firm has generated nearly $431.6m (£279m) in fees for professional services rendered and $11.1m (£7.2m) in expenses for its efforts during the massive Chapter 11 case – the largest in US history.
Those amounts represent the cumulative totals of sums previously detailed by Weil in monthly and interim fee applications filed over the course of the lengthy proceedings.
In its final request for compensation, Weil claims that "professionals in each of [the firm's] twenty domestic and international offices were called upon to represent the interests of the Debtors," as well as various affiliates, noting that without the "judgment, diligence, creativity, and tireless effort‚" of the firm's employees, it would have been nearly impossible to resolve in "little more than three years‚" the large and "incredibly complex" Lehman cases.
The filing further states that Weil lawyers and staff combined to bill a total of more than 747,000 hours on the Lehman bankruptcy and related matters, and adds that while the firm's results were "extraordinary and present a foundation for fee enhancement, Weil has determined to forego any such request."
Weil also claims that as a result of its work as lead debtors' counsel on the Lehman case, "projected recoveries for holders of allowed claims are expected to exceed $70bn (£45bn)," while the firm managed to reduce total claims against the bankrupt estate from $1.2trn (£775bn) to less than $500m (£323m).
Before its collapse in the fall of 2008, Lehman was one of Weil's largest clients. The firm collected $51.8m (£33.5m) in fees from the US financial services giant in the year prior to its bankruptcy filing, according to The Am Law Daily's previous reports. Weil then famously helped Lehman prepare for its ignominious end in record time amid the onset of the global financial crisis.
The Lehman case concluded in March, with Weil bankruptcy practice founder Harvey Miller and business finance and restructuring partner Lori Fife working on the case until the end. Only restructuring and turnaround firm Alvarez & Marsal has reaped more in Lehman-related fees.
According to data compiled by The American Lawyer for its annual Am Law 100 surveys, Weil took in roughly $3.6bn (£2.3bn) in gross revenue between 2009 and 2011. That means the firm's fees and expenses on the Lehman case accounted for 10%-12% of that total.
The Am Law Daily is a US affiliate title of Legal Week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250