Linklaters launches Italian disputes practice with Gianni hire
Linklaters is set to launch a litigation practice Italy, with the hire of disputes partner Alessandro Villani from leading independent Gianni Origoni Grippo Cappelli & Partners. Villani is expected to join Linklaters at the end of the summer. He will be based in the magic circle firm's Milan office; however the practice will cover the whole country.
July 12, 2012 at 06:28 AM
2 minute read
Linklaters is set to launch a litigation practice in Italy, with the hire of disputes partner Alessandro Villani from leading independent Gianni Origoni Grippo Cappelli & Partners.
Villani is expected to join Linklaters at the end of the summer. He will be based in the magic circle firm's Milan office; however the practice will cover the whole country.
Villani has been a partner at Gianni since 2010, prior to which he has spent time at Allen & Overy and local legacy outfit Lombardi & Associati.
His move marks a rare defection for the Italian firm and takes the total number of partners across Linklaters two Italian offices in Rome and Milan to eight.
Linklaters Italy managing partner Andrea Arosio said: "We've been looking at establishing litigation capability in Italy for some time, and we see Alessandro's hire as an important step in the development of the Milan office.
"The new litigation practice, led by Alessandro, will enable Linklaters to offer a more complete service and thereby help the firm to deepen relationships with existing clients and to attract new clients."
Linklaters and Gianni previously shared a five-year alliance that ended in 2004, with both firms admitting that the goal of an eventual merger was "unlikely".
The news comes after Gianni changed its name at the close of last year after hiring an 11-lawyer team from Grimaldi & Associati led by partner Roberto Cappelli.
Milan-based Cappelli is one of the most senior lawyers in Italy and formed part of a five-partner team leading the breakaway of Grimaldi from then merger partner Clifford Chance in 2002
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 2Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 3Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 4Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
- 5Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250