South African lawyers express concern over Government proposals to cap fees
South African lawyers could face their legal fees being capped under controversial new Government proposals designed to improve access to legal services in the country and make the profession more representative.
July 12, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Plans to boost access to SA legal services met with caution from local lawyers
South African lawyers could face their legal fees being capped under controversial new Government proposals designed to improve access to legal services in the country and make the profession more representative.
Stakeholders have until 27 July to comment on the Legal Practice Bill, which includes proposals such as the creation of a single South African Legal Practice Council and regional councils to regulate lawyers.
The Bill also includes a new legislative framework intended to open access to the profession and guarantee accessible legal services by setting a structure for determining reasonable and affordable fees.
The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) Council discussed the Bill, which also proposes allowing foreign lawyers to requalify in South Africa and guidelines for how foreign lawyers can practise in the country, earlier this month.
While the LSSA is broadly in favour of overhauling existing laws, local lawyers have warned the plans threaten the independence of the profession, which is currently regulated by a Bar Council for barristers and four regional councils overseeing solicitors, and that the fee cap could be damaging for an increasingly international market.
One South African partner commented: "The profession is very diverse – one regulator doesn't fit at all. If it had the power to cap fees, the consequences could be devastating.
"We just don't know what the Bill means for us. Where there is uncertainty there is fear, and where there is fear there is opposition."
Local lawyers expect the cap to be set relatively low in line with attempts to boost access to legal services.
However, Piet Faber, chief executive of Africa's largest law firm ENS, observed: "Access to justice could be improved with pro bono requirements or community service. The fee setting proposals are an enabling provision – it's not yet clear what they mean."
Corporate partner Morne van der Merwe (pictured), who recently joined Baker & McKenzie as part of a 31-strong team from defunct firm Dewey & LeBoeuf, said: "You cannot argue with the importance of making legal services more accessible, but I worry the Bill is slightly disconnected from current trends and realities.
"South African clients are increasingly developing the requirement for both SA and international law expertise, and we have to be cautious not to create an environment which would preclude this from happening."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250