Top UK firms show interest as Malaysia looks set to liberalise legal market
Malaysia looks set to become the latest Asian country to open up its legal market to overseas law firms, with Trowers & Hamlins, Allen & Overy (A&O) and Norton Rose among firms that could be interested in practising if the country pushes ahead with new reforms.
July 19, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Trowers ahead of the pack as Malaysia prepares to open doors to foreign law firms
Malaysia looks set to become the latest Asian country to open up its legal market to overseas law firms, with Trowers & Hamlins, Allen & Overy (A&O) and Norton Rose among firms that could be interested in practising if the country pushes ahead with new reforms.
The Legal Profession (Amendment) Bill 2012 sets out several options on how overseas law firms and lawyers could operate in the country.
These include firms opening their own offices advising on specific practice areas, for which the bill proposes a limited number of licences in a similar fashion to Singapore, or international partnerships with local firms, which may also be able to hire overseas lawyers.
Licences would be handed out by a selection committee led by the Attorney General and President of the Malaysian Bar Council, which would award, revoke or alter licence conditions and outline permitted practice areas.Those seeking to practise would have to pay a fee for their licence application.
Trowers last week confirmed it had become the first overseas firm to establish a local presence in Kuala Lumpur after gaining special approval from the Malaysia Investment Development Authority to open a non-trading representative office.
The firm now plans to apply for an independent licence to practise as soon as the new legal framework is in place – which could be as early as next year.
Trowers Malaysia head Nick White said: "Right now, we seek to develop our relationships with Malaysian clients in terms of the wide-ranging business sector legal advice they need outside of Malaysia.
"But with a full licence, we would expand that strategy by providing international expertise in relation to, for example, the energy, infrastructure, PPP and Islamic finance sectors."
According to White, the relationship between the UK and Malaysia has been "enhanced" by recent inbound investment into London real estate.
However, he said there is unlikely to be an immediate influx of foreign firms as the number of licences on offer is likely to be strictly limited.
Commenting on the bill, A&O Singapore managing partner Kenneth Aboud said: "We would certainly consider opening a Malaysia practice if the bill was passed and regulations were clearer, and would look at all the potential structures available.
"Southeast Asia is a key focus area for the firm and we would always look to expand where we think client demands can be met."
Norton Rose Asia head Jeff Smith added: "Malaysia is an important legal market. We have many years' experience advising some fantastic Malaysian clients across many jurisdictions and we would welcome a business case which would allow us to better serve the international needs of our clients there.
"In liberalising its legal sector, Malaysia has the opportunity to regulate its legal business in a way that can support and nurture the development of Malaysian financial institutions and corporations with the best international advice, expertise and experience."
The proposed overhaul has met with lukewarm response elsewhere, with some partners suggesting the market is not international enough to attract overseas firms.
Hogan Lovells Asia managing partner Crispin Rapinet said: "Historically, the Malaysian market has always been a fairly domestic one, with less international work than is the case in other jurisdictions in Southeast Asia.
"This may change if the suggestion that the banking market might open up more to international banks becomes a reality."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Headaches,' Opportunities Ahead for Corporate and Trade Lawyers Advising Foreign Businesses
4 minute readSimmons & Simmons Make Waves with 'Legal Personhood' Initiative for Whales
2 minute readLeigh Day Cleared of Wrongdoing in £55M Shell Settlement with Nigeria
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250