LG partners see profits drop 26% as revenues fall further
LG has posted a 26% drop in profits per equity partner (PEP) for 2011-12, with revenue also fallng for a second consecutive year. The firm, one of the last major UK practices to announce its results for 2011-12, has seen PEP dip by more than a quarter, from £412,000 last year to £303,000, with fee income falling 3.4% to £56m, down from £58m in 2010-11.
July 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM
2 minute read
LG has posted a 26% drop in profits per equity partner (PEP) for 2011-12, with revenue also fallng for a second consecutive year.
The firm, one of the last major UK practices to announce its results for 2011-12, has seen PEP dip by more than a quarter, from £412,000 last year to £303,000, with fee income falling 3.4% to £56m, down from £58m in 2010-11.
The revenue result comes after the firm last year dropped out of the UK top 50 rankings as turnover fell to £59m from £64.9m.
The decrease in PEP has seen the top equity payout fall 39% to £420,000, down from last year's top figure of £693,000, with the bottom of the equity falling from £206,000 to £150,000.
The decrease in PEP was attributed by the firm to high London property costs due to excess space.
LG senior partner Hugh Maule (pictured) said: "Our results reflect a slight drop in UK revenue but also illustrate the strength of our international client base – work originating from clients overseas has remained consistent and accounts again for approximately 40% of our turnover.
"We are maintaining our strategy of investing in our chosen jurisdictions, including in our newest office in Singapore. Whilst disappointing, the fall in PEP is principally due to increased property costs in London. These are now being addressed and we expect to conclude the letting of our surplus space shortly."
Revenue per lawyer has remained static at the firm at £301,000, with LG's property practice the largest contributor to revenue at £17.4m, followed by corporate at £14.2m and litigation at £12.7m.
Despite unsuccessful merger talks with Field Fisher Waterhouse, which ended last month, LG has confirmed that it is still looking for a merger "if appropriate for our business". The potential deal would have seen Field Fisher move out of its Vine Street office into LG's premises at More London Riverside.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields' Former Senior Partner Braham Knighted in New Year’s Honours
3 minute readTrio Of Firms Bag Roles In JSW Energy’s $1.5B Acquisition In India
Brazilian Firms Demarest, BMA, TozziniFreire Elevate Lawyers to Partner
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 2Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
- 3NYC’s Oldest Deli Agrees to Update Bathrooms, Entrances to End ADA Charges
- 4LSAT Administrator Sues to Block AI Tutor From Using ‘Famous, Distinctive’ Test Prep Materials
- 5'Immediately Stop Using' Pizza Puffs Term: Parties at Odds Over Judge's Injunctive Order Over Trademark
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250