Four names emerge as contenders to succeed Orrick CEO Baxter
Four US partners have emerged as front runners to replace longtime Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe chairman Ralph Baxter when he retires next year. The firm has narrowed down candidates to fill Bxter's role to Los Angeles-based finance partner Alan Benjamin; Walter Brown, a white-collar litigator in San Francisco; James Stengel, a mass torts and product liability litigator in New York; and Mitchell Zuklie, a technology-focused corporate lawyer in Silicon Valley, writes The AmLaw Daily.
August 02, 2012 at 08:11 AM
3 minute read
Four US partners have emerged as front runners to replace long-time Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe chairman Ralph Baxter when he retires next year.
The firm has narrowed down candidates to fill Baxter's role to Los Angeles-based finance partner Alan Benjamin; Walter Brown, a white-collar litigator in San Francisco; James Stengel, a mass torts and product liability litigator in New York; and Mitchell Zuklie, a technology-focused corporate lawyer in Silicon Valley, writes The AmLaw Daily.
Baxter announced his intention to step down at the end of 2013 around a year and a half ago.
All four of the partners being considered were recruited to Orrick as laterals during Baxter's reign. And while the four offer little in the way of gender or ethnic diversity, they do represent a cross-section of the firm's locations and practice areas.
The two litigators – Brown, 53, and Stengel, 56 – are described as old-fashioned trial attorneys with busy practices that may be hard to set aside if either is called on to be leader. Brown is a former federal prosecutor in Los Angeles who routinely handles high-profile white-collar cases, including several stock options back dating scandals in the past decade.
Stengel joined Orrick in New York in 1998 when his former firm, the now-defunct Donovan Leisure Newton & Irvine, was on the verge of collapse in the wake of failed merger talks with Orrick.
More than a decade younger than the others, Zuklie, 43, has made a name for himself working on the formation and financing of technology companies, carving out a niche specifically in the clean technology sector before the recent rush into that market.
Benjamin, 59, has been at the firm the longest but appears to be the least well-known of the four. He focuses on financial transactions and restructuring matters, often involving the gaming industry.
A 1994 lateral from Morrison & Foerster, where he served as Los Angeles managing partner for more than a year, Benjamin has taken on a slew of operations-side management positions at Orrick. Those roles included serving as one of four managing directors; serving on the executive committee from 1997 to 2001; chairing the private finance and banking and finance practice groups; and serving as the firm's chief financial officer in 2009 and 2010. He currently chairs of the committee that oversees the firm's finances.
In the 22 years since Baxter took on the chairman and CEO role, he has in many ways tried to make the firm look more like a corporation than a traditional partnership. He has done so in part by ceasing his law practice to focus on management, always stressing the bottom line as a top priority. Baxter, 65, has also positioned himself into a voice of the legal industry, routinely speaking out about what he believes ails the profession and making changes-including launching a back office in Wheeling, West Virginia, scrapping lockstep advancement for associates, downplaying profits per partner, and embracing alternative fee arrangements-in an attempt to set Orrick apart.
None of the four candidates returned calls for comment, and publicly the firm will only acknowledge that, per Orrick's partnership agreement, a nominating committee has been formed that will identify Baxter's successor. The committee hopes to announce its pick to the full partnership at the firm's annual January partners' meeting, says Orrick chief operating officer Reid Horovitz.
A version of this article first appeared in The AmLaw Daily, an affiliate title of Legal Week
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
Cox & Palmer to Merge with Benson Buffett in St. John’s, Canada’s Easternmost City
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250