Shoosmiths converts to LLP and revamps brand
Shoosmiths has converted to a limited liability partnership (LLP) making it one of the last firms in the UK top 50 to make the change. The national firm became an LLP last week (6 August), coinciding with the end of a 12-month review of the firm's brand and position in the market, which culminated in a brand and website re-launch.
August 07, 2012 at 10:45 AM
2 minute read
Shoosmiths has converted to a limited liability partnership (LLP) making it one of the last firms in the UK top 50 to make the change.
The national firm became an LLP last week (6 August), coinciding with the end of a 12-month review of the firm's brand and position in the market, which culminated in a brand and website re-launch.
The national firm, which is preparing for its forthcoming merger with Scottish firm Archibald Campbell & Harley in September, put together a branding committee comprising chief executive Claire Rowe, chairman Andrew Tubbs, practice heads such as commercial head David Jackson as well as partners and staff from other parts of the business.
Jackson said that as part of the exercise the firm reaffirmed its commitment to becoming a leading UK legal brand, rather than expanding internationally.
He said: "We set up an internal branding committee that looked at a number of things, including client relationships, the scope of services we offer, and where we sit in the marketplace. This doesn't signal a huge shift in direction, but we'll concentrate on what's been working, like the excellent working relationships we have with our clients. It will, though, act as a catalyst for a bolder approach when it comes to talking about our successes and telling prospective clients about the high-profile work we've been doing."
According to Jackson the firm's recent redundancy round, which saw 86 staff lose their jobs, was part of Shoosmiths' move away from high volume commodities work such as personal injury and increase the number of commercial contracts with blue-chip clients.
Shoosmiths' move to an LLP means Slaughter and May and Parabis are the only firms in the top 50 not yet to have converted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1K&L Gates Sheds Space, but Will Stay in Flagship Pittsburgh Office After Lease Renewal
- 2US Soccer Monopoly Trial Set to Kick Off in Brooklyn Federal Court
- 3NY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
- 4The 'Motherhood Advantage' in Law: Time to Flip the Script
- 5Fenwick & West Shutters Decade-Old Shanghai Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250