Weil and Quinn lead as Barclay brothers win High Court hotel battle
Weil Gotshal & Manges and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan have secured wins for their respective clients in a High Court action against the billionaire Barclay brothers over control of London-based hotels the Berkeley, the Connaught and Claridge's.
August 10, 2012 at 10:24 AM
3 minute read
Weil Gotshal & Manges and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan have secured wins for their respective clients in a High Court action against the billionaire Barclay brothers over control of London-based hotels the Berkeley, the Connaught and Claridge's.
Handing down judgment this morning (8 August) Mr Justice David Richards dismissed claims brought by Irish property developer Patrick McKillen that the Barclay brothers, companies controlled by them or directors, used unfair or prejudicial means to try to take control of Coroin – the hotels' holding company – bypassing McKillen's right to buy more shares.
McKillen has a 36.2 % shareholding in Coroin, which he acquired as part of a consortium of investors in 2004. A company controlled by the Barclay Brothers bought a 24.5% interest in the Coroin in January 2011, which has since increased to 28.4%. The brothers also acquired around £630m of the hotel company's debt last year from Ireland's National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) through a holding company called Maybourne Finance.
Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay took advice from regular adviser Weil Gotshal, which fielded a team led by London litigator Matthew Shankland.
US litigation boutique Quinn Emanuel fielded a London-based team for Irish financier and Coroin shareholder Derek Quinlan, the leader of the investment group that acquired the hotels in 2004, with London managing partner Richard East taking the lead in the case.
McKillen turned to Herbert Smith litigators John Whiteoak and Kevin Lloyd.
Ruling against McKillen, Justice Richards said no agreements had been made between the Barclay brothers and Quinlan which triggered rules in the shareholders' agreement that would have given McKillen the right to buy the shares.
In the judgment, Mr Justice Richards concluded that McKillen's petition and claim fail be dismissed, ruling: "They fail because the alleged breaches of the pre-emption and other provisions in the shareholders agreement and the alleged breaches of duty by the directors are not established (save in one instance) and because Mr McKillen cannot establish any conduct of the affairs of the company which has been unfairly prejudicial to him."
Other firms to have taken roles on the case include DLA Piper, Ashurst and Hogan Lovells. DLA acted for Coroin, instructing Nigel Dougherty of Erskine Chambers, while Hogan Lovells acted for NAMA, instructing Robin Dicker QC of South Square.
Ashurst, meanwhile, acted for the directors representing the Barclays brothers on the board of Coroin – Richard Faber, Michael Seal and Rigel Mowatt – with the firm instructing Joe Smouha QC of Essex Court Chambers to appear in court.
Herbert Smith instructed Philip Marshall QC and Richard Hill QC of Serle Court for the claimant, while Quinn Emanuel instructed Michael Fealy and Michael d'Arcy of One Essex Court. Weil instructed counsel including 1 Essex Court's Kenneth Maclean QC.
- Click here for a link to the judgment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250