Former Dewey partners receive latest amendments to settlement plan
Dewey & LeBoeuf's wind-down team has offered to spare the defunct firm's ex partners from all potential litigation from secured lenders as an incentive to participate in the proposed partner clawback settlement. The latest revisions to the so-called 'partner contribution plan' were posted to a secure web link overnight, with lead bankruptcy lawyer Al Togut and chief restructuring officer Joff Mitchell also confirming that the deadline for signing up to the agreement had been postponed again.
August 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM
3 minute read
Dewey & LeBoeuf's wind-down team has offered to spare the defunct firm's ex partners from all potential litigation from secured lenders as an incentive to participate in the proposed partner clawback settlement.
The latest revisions to the so-called 'partner contribution plan' were posted to a secure web link overnight, with lead bankruptcy lawyer Al Togut and chief restructuring officer Joff Mitchell also confirming that the deadline for signing up to the agreement had been postponed again.
Partners now have until tomorrow (16 August) to ratify the agreement, with the bankruptcy team justifying the delays in an email to former partner yesterday.
The email states: "The reason for the delay in posting this is simple – lawyers for partners, the lenders and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors participated in drafting changes that we deemed important and there were a lot of people involved in this process which made it time-consuming."
The main change is a waiver given to former partners by the secured lenders – which include JP Morgan, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Citibank, as well as a number of insurance companies – meaning they will not be able to pursue legal claims against them if they sign up to the partnership contribution plan.
The defunct law firm drew down $75m (£47.8m) of a $100m (£63.8m) credit line from a banking consortium led by JPMorgan earlier this year, as well as issuing a $125m (£79.7m) bond in 2010 taken up by insurance companies.
One partner commented: "The only ones to benefit practically from this release are, in my view, the members of the executive committee or the office of the chair as they could be personally potentially sued by the note holders and the secured lenders for not having disclosed the true state of the finances of the Firm and for claims of having misled them into financing the firm."
He added: "I don't see how the other partners would benefit from such a release as there is no link between us as limited partners in the partnership and the lenders."
Separately, documents filed this week on Companies House show that proposals issued last month (20 July) by Dewey's UK administrators BDO have been approved after no creditors of the UK LLP or its holding company took up the option of calling a creditors' meeting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250