Graduate intake at top UK law firms falls 11% over post-crunch years
Graduate recruitment across the bulk of the UK top 20 looks set to shrink by more than 10% between 2008-09 and 2013-14 as firms continue to scale back trainee numbers in response to the dampened economic climate.
September 06, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Economic gloom pushes top firms to scale back trainee numbers
Graduate recruitment across the bulk of the UK top 20 looks set to shrink by more than 10% between 2008-09 and 2013-14 as firms continue to scale back trainee numbers in response to the dampened economic climate.
Research by Legal Week into the graduate intakes at the UK's top law firms shows recruitment numbers will drop by 11% across the period, with Linklaters, Allen & Overy (A&O), Herbert Smith and Eversheds making the biggest reductions.
While most firms initially cut back numbers for the 2009-10 graduate intakes in the wake of the 2008 Lehman Brothers collapse, recruitment has not picked up again, with some major firms continuing to make small reductions.
The figures show Eversheds' 52-strong 2013-14 graduate intake looks set to be 38% smaller than the equivalent intake in 2008-09. Meanwhile, Herbert Smith and A&O will see respective reductions of 25% and 21%, while Linklaters' target recruitment figures show a drop of 15%.
In contrast, Irwin Mitchell is one of the few to buck the trend without a merger, with the firm increasing its graduate hiring by 46% from 24 to 35 over the same years.
A&O training principal David Campbell said: "Our aim is that, as far as possible, the number of newly-qualified (NQ) jobs on offer matches up to the number of trainees qualifying with us – and there just won't be as many London NQ jobs in the future.
"Firms face a straightforward choice: we can continue to recruit at the same levels regardless of the economic situation and retain fewer on qualification, or we can reduce recruitment and keep retention levels up. We chose the latter."
Eversheds senior HR business manager Sara Lewis said: "Our trainee numbers are based on proposed NQ numbers for the future. We also want to ensure that the trainees have a first-class experience during their training contract. Our training contracts aim to offer a high quality experience and a strong final retention rate."
The research also shows trainee retention rates have recovered slightly since spring 2010, when the average across the UK top 20 stood at 77%. This figure rose to 85% by September 2011, but slipped back to 80% in September 2012.
Pinsents has seen the lowest average retention rate across the six intakes during 2010-12 with 71%, followed by Hogan Lovells on 72% and SJ Berwin at 74%.
Berwin Leighton Paisner, Slaughter and May and Clyde & Co have the best average retention rates over the period, with all standing at more than 86%.
The graduate recruitment figures do not include Clyde & Co or Pinsent Masons as their recent mergers artificially inflate the numbers, while Norton Rose has been excluded as it did not provide all of the data. The retention rate research excludes Simmons & Simmons for the same reason.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia
What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market
7 minute readReport: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250