Salans gears up for SNR Denton merger vote; 75% partnership approval required
Salans is gearing up to vote on its potential tie-up with SNR Denton, as merger talks between the firms advance.
September 13, 2012 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Salans is gearing up to vote on its potential tie-up with SNR Denton, as merger talks between the firms advance.
Legal Week has learned that 75% of Salans partners will be required to approve the merger for it to go ahead, with the vote expected to take place imminently.
However, it is believed that SNR Denton partners have not yet been officially notified of a vote, or received an indication of when a vote will take place.
It is also understood that there has been no communication between practice group heads and their Salans counterparts.
Talks between the two firms' senior management are thought to have begun last year. It is not yet known how the tie-up will be branded or financially structured.
SNR Denton, which was formed by the merger of UK firm Denton Wilde Sapte and US firm Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal in 2010, is structured as a Swiss verein.
The firm reported revenues of $712m (£443m) for 2011-12, which combined with Salans' 2011 calendar year turnover of $287m (£179m) would create a firm worth a projected £622m.
Salans has 770 lawyers – including 192 partners – across 20 offices in 17 countries, with profits per equity partner (PEP) of $766,000 (£477,000).
SNR Denton, which reported global PEP of $738,000 (£460,000) for the 2011-12 financial year, has about 500 partners across offices in 14 countries, as well as associate offices in 30 further countries.
The news comes after it emerged at the end of 2011 that Salans' alliance with Pinsent Masons had been terminated, with Pinsents subsequently opening a string of offices in continental Europe this year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler, Noerr, Freshfields Steer Multi-Million Euro Deals for XXXLutz, Huf Group & More
3 minute readFreshfields Leads European M&A Rankings Again in 2024, as U.S. Firms Gain Market Share
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Report - Jan. 20
- 2Saxton & Stump Lands Newly Retired Ex-Chief Judge From Middle District of Pa.
- 3Judicial Admissions and Medical Malpractice Defense
- 4South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 5'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250