SJ Berwin to push out partners as market conditions continue to bite
SJ Berwin is set to ask a small number of partners to leave as the firm looks to cut back in response to market conditions. The City firm is launching a restructuring that what will see a number of partners leave the firm, although it is not clear which practice areas will be affected. It is understood that there will not be any de-equitisations associated with the re-structuring.
September 26, 2012 at 06:09 AM
2 minute read
SJ Berwin is set to ask a small number of partners to leave as the firm looks to cut back in response to market conditions.
The City firm is launching a restructuring that what will see a number of partners leave the firm, although it is not clear which practice areas will be affected. It is understood that there will not be any de-equitisations associated with the re-structuring.
In a statement the firm said: "As with all law firms, we actively manage the partnership. This is an ongoing process to ensure that the size and structure of the organisation best meets the needs of what continues to be a challenging market."
SJ Berwin previously carried out a restructuring in 2009 when it asked "fewer than six" of its 170-strong partnership to leave the firm. In that process both equity and non-equity partners were affected, with at least three exiting partners understood to be in the firm's London real estate practice. The firm's partnership was not consulted on the decision, with only those hit by the cuts formally informed of the measures.
Over the last year a number of City firms have looked to down-size their partnerships in non-core practice areas as the downturn continues to bite.
Earlier this year, Simmons & Simmons restructured its partnership in an effort to boost profitability, with around 10% of the firm's equity thought to be affected.
Linklaters reshaped its partnership last December, with the final outcome affecting 41 partners worldwide. Of this figure, 25 were asked to leave the firm altogether, with the remaining 16 either stripped of their equity status or asked to take a reduced profit share.
Herbert Smith also carried out a restructuring in the same month, asking around 15 partners from its corporate and finance practices firmwide to leave.
Related articles:
- SJ Berwin reacts to tough market conditions with partner exits
- Simmons bids to revive profits with partnership restructuring
- Herbert Smith attributes associate cuts to partnership restructuring
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArizona Board Approves KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Simmons Partner Joins French IP Boutique to Lead New Amsterdam Outpost
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Court Rejects San Francisco's Challenge to Robotaxi Licenses
- 2'Be Prepared and Practice': Paul Hastings' Michelle Reed Breaks Down Firm's First SEC Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure Report
- 3Lina Khan Gives Up the Gavel After Contentious 4 Years as FTC Chair
- 4Allstate Is Using Cell Phone Data to Raise Prices, Attorney General Claims
- 5Epiq Announces AI Discovery Assistant, Initially Developed by Laer AI, With Help From Sullivan & Cromwell
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250