Asia M&A sector holds up despite economic gloom as IPO work dips
Given the investment that international law firms have poured into Asia, there will be no shortage of partners reading the latest deal statistics to gauge the impact that the cooling of the region's major economies has had on bid activity. The good news is while M&A activity is not thriving, in global terms Asia is faring better than most.
October 11, 2012 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Asia outperforms Europe with rise in deal value, but fortunes vary across region. Elizabeth Broomhall reports
Given the investment that international law firms have poured into Asia, there will be no shortage of partners reading the latest deal statistics to gauge the impact that the cooling of the region's major economies has had on bid activity.
The good news is while M&A activity is not thriving, in global terms Asia is faring better than most.
Mergermarket's stats for Asia show that the region was one of the few global markets to see a quarterly rise in deal value in Q3, with the Asia-Pacific region (excluding Japan) seeing a 16.6% rise in deal value to hit $89.5bn (£55.4bn).
This contrasted with sharp falls in European M&A as nervousness in boardrooms continued to put many acquisitions on hold.
Over the more representative first three quarters of 2012, Asia-Pacific deals totalled $246.3bn (£153bn), down 13.2% on the same period in 2011. The most active sectors in the region were TMT; industrials and chemicals; and energy, mining and utilities.
Good resilience
In context, it is clear that corporate markets, while being affected by the uncertain global economy, have held up much better than the volatile initial public offering (IPO) market in Asia, which has seen plunging activity levels this year, particularly in Hong Kong.
"The M&A and private equity sectors haven't been as quiet as capital markets since they are driven by different factors," says Nick Seddon, Eversheds' Asia managing partner.
"Our experience is that there is still a reasonable amount of M&A work going on, with activity being driven by a combination of value and risk."
Jeremy Hunt, a Hong Kong-based corporate partner from Morrison & Foerster, who was recently hired from Allen & Overy, agrees with Seddon that M&A is holding up solidly in comparison to the current slump in the typically volatile IPO sector.
He comments: "Looking at volume, though the number of transactions is down slightly on last year, the M&A sector is certainly looking better than the capital markets arena at the moment.
"The figures also reflect the development of Asian countries – typically, as a market matures, M&A activity increases. The long-term view is that this will continue as the region's economies grow."
Also interesting is the kind of deals that have taken place in 2012. One transaction saw China's largest e-commerce company, Alibaba Group, restructure its business engagements with Yahoo! for $7.6bn (£4.7bn), while another involved Hong Kong-based City Telecom relinquishing its 100% stake in Hong Kong Broadband to private equity house CVC.
"There have been some very interesting M&A deals announced or completed this year," says Michael Liu (pictured), managing partner at Latham & Watkins' Hong Kong arm.
"Many of the deals [in Asia] are resourced-focused, but current market conditions are also encouraging some [Chinese] property developers to recycle capital."
That said, Mergermarket's research illustrates the sharply contrasting fortunes for dealmakers across the wider region.
While South Korea and Australia have attracted substantial interest from legal advisers in recent years, deal activity was down in both markets, respectively falling annually by 47% and 43.9% in terms of deal values over Q1-Q3.
In contrast, Indonesia reported a total M&A deal value of $12.3bn (£7.6bn) for the first three quarters of 2012, a 185.3% increase on last year's results. Advisers put this down to the country's fast-growing economy and a current wave of energy-related investments.
Singapore was another stand-out market, with total bids of $24.6bn (£15.3bn) over the first nine months of 2012, a rise of 152% on the same period in 2011. China also saw a 9% increase in the value of deals on the same period in 2011, with bids totalling $91bn (£56.5bn).
Medium-term concerns
But even if the results are solid in the context of the global economy, views vary on the medium-term prospects for M&A in the region.
Certainly, many firms are apprehensive about the prospects for deal work in Asia, with Hunt believing that the full effect of the downturn in the public markets this summer remains to be seen.
Likewise, Eversheds' Seddon says that, given the turbulent market conditions, it is likely that advisers will increase their focus on the wider corporate market while equity capital markets work remains slow.
Liu concludes: "There are many more transactions still in discussion/negotiation stage, which are not progressing particularly quickly.
"Many people in China and Hong Kong are adopting a wait-and-see attitude pending the outcome of China's leadership transition taking place in November, and the overall negative sentiment around the world has not helped with deal activity either.
"Given the depressed levels at which many US-listed Chinese companies are trading, we also expect to see more 'going private' transactions involving them."
Turning to individual rankings, there was cause for cheers for Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, which was the top-ranked firm on Asia-Pacific bids after advising on 16 deals with a combined value of $29.2bn (£18.1bn).
There was also good news for King & Wood Mallesons, which acted on the highest numbers of Asia-related bids: 57 deals with a combined value of $21.3bn (£13.2bn).
But in a more subdued market, the question is whether there will be enough to go around for everyone.
Top Asia-Pacific advisers Q1-Q3 2012 – by volume
Firm / Value ($bn) / Deal count
King & Wood
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKMPG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250