New York elite reshape junior ranks amid sustained fee pressure
Some of New York's leading law firms have taken steps to reposition their business in response to falling client demand and pressure on fees for the most junior US lawyers.
October 11, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
US leaders adapt to New Normal as clients reject high leverage
Some of New York's leading law firms have taken steps to reposition their business in response to falling client demand and pressure on fees for the most junior US lawyers.
Figures for 2012 show that while some top US firms have brought hiring back up to peak levels, others are continuing to hold back recruitment of their most junior associates.
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton are among those that increased the number of summer associates joining them this year and last following a dip in 2010. Firms generally tend to recruit a large number of their summer associates to join as first year lawyers one or two years later.
Paul Weiss took on its largest group of associates over the summer for five years at 125, having dropped to 83 in 2010, while Cleary's number rose to 115 this year, having temporarily fallen to 75 in 2010.
Cleary finance partner and business development head Steven Wilner said: "We like to take the long-term view with respect to our hiring, so that we are investing for the future. We slightly adjusted the size of our summer class during the height of the financial crisis, but realised it was unnecessary because the firm was busier than anticipated during that period. Our subsequent summer class sizes have returned to our usual levels."
In contrast, others such as Shearman & Sterling, White & Case and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom are keeping the numbers down in new associate classes. Shearman's US first-year associate class stands at 41 for those joining last month, compared with an equivalent figure of 89 in 2008 – down 54%; while White & Case's new US associate class has fallen from 90 in 2008 to around 60 in 2012.
Meanwhile, Skadden has also roughly halved its new associate numbers from a peak of around 300, the bulk of which are in America.
Skadden executive partner Eric Friedman (pictured above) commented: "One of the things we're seeing is that the leverage model has changed. The kind of work you can push down to juniors has changed. That doesn't mean it's all bad for the industry, but it does mean the hiring approach has shifted as there's less demand for high-volume lower-expertise work."
Shearman senior partner Creighton Condon added (pictured right): "It is a fundamental change in the model. Clients want more partners active on their deals. Class intake numbers will go back when activity increases, but we are unlikely to return to the higher numbers that were so common in the past."
The recruitment changes come as firms also grapple with clients being unwilling to pay for first and second-year associates on deals because of their lack of work experience. This also takes the form of specific requests to staff deals with more senior lawyers.
Several US firms have launched training initiatives to combat this, with Cleary starting a two-week full-time 'mini-MBA' programme for all new associates in 2012 focused on business and finance, while Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy teamed up with Harvard Law School last autumn to provide an additional training programme for junior lawyers.
Click here to take part in the Legal Week Client Satisfaction Survey 2012.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250