Sale of the 21st century – where now for law firm BD?
I understand the pressure for law firms to reduce their costs, and why this topic has exercised the profession in recent years, but for a long time I have wondered why there is so little corresponding attention paid to the other side of the equation: the ability to win work.
October 25, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
I understand the pressure for law firms to reduce their costs, and why this topic has exercised the profession in recent years, but for a long time I have wondered why there is so little corresponding attention paid to the other side of the equation: the ability to win work.
Businesses rise or fall on their ability to grow the top line – subject to normal caveats about pricing and the right kind of work – not on how good they are at bringing down costs. Watching the pennies is important but it ain't the magic of capitalism – especially in a field where a few pitch wins can bring in millions.
So it's important. And yet, even as a paid-up industry anorak, I didn't have a clue which law firms were great at it and which were terrible. And never have I seen any evidence that law firms had much sense of whether their peers were any good or how to benchmark their own efforts.
This week's in depth on business development has gone a fair way towards lifting my fog, though the dark arts of law firm BD still seem unnecessarily shrouded in mystery. The first point to take away is that it is clear that it has moved on a lot since the ad hoc party planners of the 1990s. Sophistication has improved, genuine specialists with industry experience have been shipped in and a fairly select band of effective operators have emerged.
That said, quality remains uneven and you still see a stark difference between what you would consider a sales or marketing professional in most industries and the typical breed in law, who often still seem rather inward-facing.
Much of that is thanks to the strange ambiguity about sales in law firms. Eighty percent of lawyers hate selling, but they still don't much like non-lawyers to do it, which means they have a lot of BD people who don't want to do it either. Weird. That lack of consensus about the role of BD, and feelings of being under-valued by partners, has contributed to a defensiveness among law firm marketeers that they should try to grow out of fairly soon. Ultimately, being benchmarked will be good news for the better BD teams out there.
One interesting observation that's been notable for a while is the marked improvement in BD among top firms. The mid-tier still do some of the most creative stuff but they don't seem to have quite the across-the-board strength or thrusting attitude of old. Many of the best BD operators were outside the City leaders a decade ago – that dynamic has changed.
Still, however you do your BD – whether through lawyers or marketing professionals – the discipline matters far more than usually acknowledged by the industry. The law firms that dominate the 21st century will have fully grasped that fundamental reality.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Eversheds Sutherland Outgoing Co-CEO to Move to Dubai to Spur Regional Growth
2 minute readMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250