Saudi Arabia set to allow female lawyers to appear in court
Saudi lawyers have hailed news that women are set to be permitted to argue cases in court, in an overhaul of the country's justice system which could be in place as early as next month.
October 25, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Local lawyers confident women will be allowed in court, opening up access to untapped female clients
Saudi lawyers have hailed news that women are set to be permitted to argue cases in court, in an overhaul of the country's justice system which could be in place as early as next month.
The ruling, expected to be confirmed at the beginning of November, will enable qualified female lawyers to apply for a licence to present cases in court, according to reports quoting a justice ministry directive.
Female lawyers with a law degree and at least three years' experience working in a lawyer's office would be able to apply.
The existing regulations permit women to practise law as representatives and give legal advice on behalf of clients up to the point where a case reaches the courtroom.
The ministry has not yet released an official statement on the matter; however, lawyers in the local market believe that the changes are likely to be put in place and have the potential access to an untapped female client base.
Baker Botts Middle East head Robert Jordan, who is based in Riyadh, said: "I think the regulation is likely to happen, but we'll have to wait and hope that the rules are well crafted. We've recently built out space for female lawyers to practise in our regional office, so we're delighted to see they're moving forward in allowing women to move into courts.
"A tremendous amount of wealth nowadays is held by Saudi women – it's a market that is growing, so we are paying attention to their needs including that they are well served by female lawyers.
"The main driver that sets women apart from men as practitioners at the moment is that, in order to be a fully qualified practitioner, they must have court experience. This way they can become lawyers, as opposed to legal advisers in the background – it will get them out of the library and into the conference room, and the chance to finally advance in their profession. This would form a career path that would attract more talent to the legal profession as well – and clients want the best and brightest."
Under the leadership of King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia has pushed through a number of initiatives to help boost the role of women in the traditionally male-dominated society, including giving women the right to vote from 2015 and the construction of Princess Noura University, the first women's university in the country.
Riyadh-based Hogan Lovells finance partner Imran Mufti added: "It would be a positive step. There is a significant amount of wealth held by Saudi women through inheritance or commercial entrepreneurship.
"So from that perspective interaction between legal advisers and Saudi business women will be encouraged as they would likely confide more in female lawyers, when they would previously rely on husbands or brothers to carry cases forward. This increased interaction would give greater access to a client base that will open up a lot more.
"In most cases, private practices and law firms will need to catch up with these rules if they are put in place, as segregation in the workplace remains a legal requirement. But I expect we'd see more female law students looking to develop professional skills in law offices across the region, as well as female clients looking for legal advisers."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250