US law firms tap China's go-private market amid global IPO slump
Latham and Kirkland among firms benefiting from booming take-private sector, says Elizabeth Broomhall
November 01, 2012 at 08:07 PM
5 minute read
Latham and Kirkland among firms benefiting from booming take-private sector, says Elizabeth Broomhall
US law firms with offices in Asia are tapping into China's lucrative take-private market as Chinese companies look to de-list in the US and consider returning to local exchanges.
Latham & Watkins, Kirkland & Ellis and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom are among a raft of firms focusing their efforts on Chinese companies de-listing from US stock exchanges as the prolonged slump in Hong Kong initial public offering (IPO) work shows no sign of abating – targeting growth where they have an edge over UK counterparts.
Kirkland, which has invested millions in its Asia practice – including the hire of an eight-partner Hong Kong team in 2011 – has been working on five go-private deals involving Chinese companies so far this year, including the proposed $3.5bn (£2.2bn) de-listing of Focus Media from Nasdaq which, if successful, will be the largest Chinese company to exit a US exchange.
Latham, meanwhile, has been involved in three transactions, including the ongoing $176m (£109m) management buyout of ShangPharma, while Skadden has been advising on 10 deals, including the proposed $334m (£207m) de-listing of Yongye International, a crop and animal nutrients manufacturer.
Davis Polk & Wardwell and Shearman & Sterling are also active in the field, with Shearman advising on deals such as the $2.33bn (£1.44bn) management buyout of Chinese internet firm Shanda Interactive.
Firms advising US incorporated companies, who are potentially subject to shareholder litigation, can generate fees of more than $5m (£3.1m) on one deal, say partners in Hong Kong, while those representing buyers – typically chief executives, major shareholders and private equity funds – can earn up to $2m (£1.24m).
"The going-private sector, just due to the sheer number of companies doing this, has attracted the attention of a lot of international law firms, mostly US firms," says David Zhang (pictured), a corporate partner at Kirkland in Hong Kong.
"We are very active in this market and working on a lot of deals. They are complex transactions, drawing on many practice areas, so you need a first-rate US securities lawyer, as well as expertise in private equity, M&A and bank finance."
Take-private transactions
The shift towards take-private transactions first emerged in 2010, in the wake of declining equity market valuations in the US and a spate of fraud allegations against PRC companies, with the increasing regulatory crackdown and damage to investor confidence prompting many companies to de-list to avoid further investigation.
According to a report by Roth Capital Partners, some 37 China take-privates have been announced in the last two years, with 14 of the deals already completed and another 18 still ongoing.
The flow of delistings announced in 2012 alone contrasts sharply with the number of Chinese companies choosing to float in the US, with just one such deal taking place in 2012.
"As for Chinese companies doing US-registered IPOs – that ship has sailed, so we're less focused on that," said Matthew Bersani, the Asia managing partner for Shearman.
"Take-private deals on the other hand are a huge business right now, as many Chinese companies want out of the US market. In fact, up to half our 2012 China M&A revenue relates to this kind of work."
Firms expect transactions to increase as US investors remain sceptical of Chinese companies. They also believe many Chinese companies may choose to re-list in their own markets, as shares in the US continue to trade at depressed levels and a valuation differential emerges between those listed in the US and peers listed in Asia.
"Where there are valuation discrepancies [between Asia and the US], there is a belief among management and shareholders that their companies could be worth a much higher amount on exchanges such as Hong Kong," says Mark Lehmkuhler, a corporate partner at Davis Polk.
"A number of the US-listed companies that have gone private in the past year or two will therefore start to reappear in IPOs in Hong Kong and elsewhere in Asia in the next couple of years, which will boost the regional IPO business," Lehmkuhler adds.
Pressure drop
As Asia increasingly feels the impact of the global economic slowdown, several Hong Kong firms have confirmed that pressure to reduce legal fees has resulted in some state-owned enterprises asking tendering firms to reveal fee quotes in front of their competitors.
The previously booming Hong Kong IPO market has been hit particularly hard, with competition for work resulting in some law firms quoting advisory fees of less than $1m (£620,000) for a float.
In addition to falling IPO activity, recent deal statistics from Mergermarket show that M&A activity in Asia-Pacific totalled $246.3bn (£153bn) in the first three quarters of 2012, down 13.2% on the same period in 2011.
Commenting on the market, Norton Rose corporate partner and head of North Asia Phillip John said: "Especially in the IPO market at the moment there aren't many transactions, and in any market where activity eases off, there is always fee pressure."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250