Multi-polar world risky yet satisfying for GCs, but are law firms being written out of the equation?
As the headlines attest seemingly every day, it's a riskier world out there for multinationals. Yet, judging by a major report on the attitudes of general counsel (GC) at some of the world's largest companies, senior in-house lawyers have learned to like it that way. The oxymoronic observation emerges in the report 'Issues & Priorities for Senior In-House Counsel Worldwide', which is released this month...
November 08, 2012 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
A major new study argues that risky markets enhance GC role. Alex Newman and Alex Novarese report
As the headlines attest seemingly every day, it's a riskier world out there for multinationals. Yet, judging by a major report on the attitudes of general counsel at some of the world's largest companies, senior in-house lawyers have learned to like it that way.
The oxymoronic observation emerges in the report 'Issues & Priorities for Senior In-House Counsel Worldwide', which is released this month. Eschewing the hackneyed focus on attitudes to law firms and panels, the report, conducted by the referral network World Law Group and consultant ELD International, finds risk and compliance concerns dominating the agenda of GCs, particularly in Western economies.
Respondents were drawn primarily from GC or other senior in-house roles at major companies across 33 countries, with 20.4% of the more than 350 respondents coming from China and a further 21.4% from other Asia-Pacific countries. The report focused on large companies, with 42% working at organisations with revenues of more than $10bn (£6.28bn).
With companies wrestling with the cross-border push towards aggressive regulatory enforcement, the four-year slump in the global economy and the uncertainties of expanding in markets like China and India – it is unsurprising that managing risk has moved up the GC agenda. Still, the results are stark.
Asked to identify their top three concerns, 45% of corporate counsel cited the difficulty of effectively covering risks in emerging markets and 43% keeping up with 'so many compliance challenges'. The most cited concern – the struggle to meet demand for services given resource constraints, cited by 56.6% – also reflects risk, as GCs try to navigate an increasingly uncertain globalised marketplace.
Risk also dominates the priorities of legal teams for the year ahead, with the aim of improving compliance capability named by 43.3% of respondents – the most popular goal. The second greatest priority was to 'reduce external legal costs', while other goals were dominated by attempts to improve the efficiency and sophistication of in-house legal teams via team restructurings or investment in technology and training.
Identifying specific regulatory risks, two areas stood out: anti-corruption/bribery and antitrust, cited by 38.7% and 38.4% of respondents respectively, while data protection/privacy was cited by 30%.
With GCs under cost pressure, 70% of respondents said that cuts to legal resources had increased risks for their company, with a further 15% believing there had been a 'marginal' increase in risk due to cost-cutting.
Yet despite what appears to be a gloomy picture of over-worked GCs struggling to cope with sprawling global networks, the report found clear evidence that job satisfaction has risen markedly since the banking crisis four years ago.
Fifty-four per cent of senior in-house counsel said they liked their job now more than 'a few years ago', against just 18.5% who said they were less satisfied. The contradiction appears to be largely due to the riskier environment providing a more central role for legal teams. Eighty per cent of those with rising satisfaction put it down to the 'stronger role of corporate counsel'.
Commenting on the findings, Edward Gretton, head of legal at Hanson, said: "I do not accept that less resource must always mean more risk. GCs need to be smarter in delivering their control output in matters such as risk management and compliance. Too often, lawyers lose themselves in the detail of risk management and the latest regulatory developments, without asking themselves whether their control measures will work to deliver the business culture their stakeholders deserve."
Sony Mobile Communications corporate vice president and GC Jonathan Pearl added: "This is a new era for multinational companies, which are now having to compete with competitors from emerging markets, which are working on a lower cost base and are generally subject to less regulation. GCs need to embrace this change and do things differently."
The focus on rising satisfaction via becoming a more integral part of the business has a number of implications for the corporate legal industry. When asked which key single element would improve the work of their legal team, 43.6% said greater integration with the business, while a further 12.8% cited more access to the executives/board.
This priority is reflected when GCs were asked about key strategies to improve the work of their team. The most popular existing approach was to invest in business or commercial training for the legal team.
Taken collectively, the findings raise the question of the extent to which in-house legal teams are downsizing the role of law firms. The report found substantial willingness of bluechip clients to turn to non-law firm providers to help support their work, though compliance training specialists and e-discovery/litigation support providers were more popular than legal process outsourcers.
Janet McCarthy, former GC at Mitsui & Co, commented: "GCs have to be smarter about what work they outsource in a difficult economic time coupled with a riskier legal environment. In-house teams will continue with a reliance on external firms to provide advice on specialist technical issues. On the other hand, I have seen a trend for GCs building expertise internally to ensure the in-house function can operate more efficiently for the business."
More positive news for law firms came from Chinese general counsel, who had little concern regarding the cost of legal advice and were far more concerned with the challenge of supporting the commercial activity of their employers.
However, the overall picture to emerge suggests global legal teams are increasingly eyeing a future in which they are more fully embedded with their employers – and far less reliant on external suppliers.
ELD president Leigh Dance sums up the mood: "You have to spend way less money as a GC now. What it all equates to is having to re-engineer and restructure. In-house lawyers are proceeding apace with or without law firms informed or at the table."
For more analysis, see Risk and return – can law firms get with the new GC agenda?
The multi-polar perspective – key findings
- Risk concerns dominate the agenda of global GCs – risk, regulatory and compliance issues were cited across a key range of indicators
- 88% of respondents have access to senior management
- Despite a clear consensus that legal teams are managing on tighter budgets, job satisfaction has risen over recent years for more than half of respondents
- GCs are overwhelmingly focused on improving their internal legal functions, whether through training, IT investment or reorganisation rather than refining services from outside counsel
Source: World Law Group; ELD International
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250