Risk and return – can law firms get with the new GC agenda?
"Law firms just don't get it, they spend all their time thinking about transactions and that's so far off the agenda for general counsel right now. What GCs are focused on is risk." So said an old contact of mine who spends much of their time working with senior corporate counsel. It's hard to argue. Everywhere you turn there is risk for large companies.
November 08, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
"Law firms just don't get it, they spend all their time thinking about transactions and that's so far off the agenda for general counsel right now. What GCs are focused on is risk."
So said an old contact of mine who spends much of their time working with senior corporate counsel. It's hard to argue. Everywhere you turn there is risk for large companies. This week alone has seen HSBC put a $1.5bn (£934m) price tag on its expected fine after falling foul of US money laundering laws. Standard Chartered and Barclays have likewise had costly brushes with prosecutors this year and the Libor fall-out looks only to be getting started.
And consider the other forces at play for GCs: the global push towards tough enforcement against bribery and competition violations; a swathe of new financial services regulation; and the continued impact of the post-9/11 push towards extra-territorial prosecution.
It's a picture well-illustrated by a report commissioned by the World Law Group network, which we cover this week. The research focuses on the attitudes of GCs across 33 countries. Managing risk; re-engineering the legal function; improving internal tech and training; finding ways to integrate with the business. These are the things engaging the 'multi-polar' GCs of tomorrow – not managing their outside counsel.
Do law firms really get this? Doubtful. Following clients via international expansion is second nature to the modern law firm, but whether they are ready to mirror the shift in mindset towards risk is questionable at best. Global law firms remain to a considerable extent deal machines – nothing wrong with that, but the question is whether that is well suited to the legal industry of the early 21st century.
True, there is a lot more imaginative thinking at elite law firms than five years ago, but progress is probably too slow; because clients have already become some of the most dangerous rivals to external counsel. Many bluechips now spend as much on legal services internally as they do with law firms – a largely unremarked revolution that has swept Western legal markets over the last 25 years. And it's a more immediate threat to law firms than LPOs or Tesco law. At a certain point, multinationals amassing globally diffuse in-house teams the size of large law firms will start forging their own legal production lines in earnest. Judged by this research, that process is accelerating.
Perhaps the biggest warning sign for external law firms is that their response to this risk-heavy, resource-constrained environment is the polar opposite of their largest clients. While law firms long for the deals to return, GCs spy opportunity amid the turbulence. They see a world in which they are more integral to their own employers – and that means law firms have to move down the food chain.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWorkload and Getting It All Done Top Challenges for In-house Counsel: Survey
4 minute readAmazon Corporate Counsel in Brussels Returns to US Firm in ‘Boomerang Hire’
2 minute readFormer Miral GC Brings Commercial Insight to BCLP’s Middle East Real Estate Practice
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250