Norton Rose chief gears up for post-merger expansion in New York and LatAm
Norton Rose chief executive Peter Martyr is gearing up to expand in locations including New York and Latin America as the firm prepares to go live with its $2bn (£1.26bn) merger with Houston's Fulbright & Jaworski in June 2013. The Norton Rose Fulbright tie-up will give the firm 800 lawyers across 11 offices in the US, with 110 of these in New York, including 50 partners.
November 22, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Firm head Martyr sets out plans to grow New York base and launch in Brazil following tie-up with Fulbright
Norton Rose chief executive Peter Martyr is gearing up to expand in locations including New York and Latin America as the firm prepares to go live with its $2bn (£1.26bn) merger with Houston's Fulbright & Jaworski in June 2013.
The Norton Rose Fulbright tie-up will give the firm 800 lawyers across 11 offices in the US, with 110 of these in New York, including 50 partners.
Martyr hopes to expand the practice further by adding on teams of lawyers, with the firm also targeting launches in Brazil, South Korea and Turkey in the coming years.
Martyr (pictured) told Legal Week: "We plan on growing the New York base. Fulbright has a good platform and strong standing there for a firm that isn't headquartered in New York, but we plan to expand there in terms of teams and lateral hires."
He added: "We are looking at launching in Brazil next year. Other areas of interest we'd be looking at covering over the next five years are South Korea and Turkey. Nothing is on the cards at the moment, but we'll be keeping a very close eye on how those markets develop."
On top of merging with firms in South Africa and Australia in the past two years, Norton Rose has combined with two Canadian firms: Ogilvy Renault in June 2011 and Macleod Dixon in January 2012. As such, Martyr, who will hold the same position at the merged firm when the deal goes live, does not rule out a second tie-up in the States in the longer term.
"As for a second US merger partner, well, how could we rule it out after what happened in Canada? But it is early days and not on the cards at the moment. Our combination with Fulbright has given us a powerful platform, which we are focusing on developing."
Though Norton Rose's Asia-Pacific capabilities were boosted by the merger with Australia's Deacons, which went live in 2010, the firm is still relatively light in mainland China; however, Martyr maintains there is no rush to agree a deal there.
He commented: "Everyone would consider a combination in mainland China. With some markets, such as Canada, Australia and South Africa, it helps to be a first-mover, but I don't think firms need to be first-movers in China. While we wouldn't rule it out in future, there is no need to rush into the market as I expect the profession will evolve significantly over the next few years."
According to Martyr, the combination with Fulbright has filled a crucial gap in Norton Rose's international strategy. "It was a simple plan to begin with – a firm can't be global without being in the US. The CEO of a big firm asked me: 'How can you call yourselves global if you're not in the States?' So that was the main driver behind the merger.
"From there we worked backwards – the idea was to build up a connected business around the world, centred around energy, resources and financial institutions work. And then we sought out a firm that would be a culturally good fit."
The firms will not be financially integrated, with the US arm adding to the existing Swiss verein structure. However, partners in Fulbright offices in Beijing, Hong Kong, London and Munich – where Norton Rose already has a base – will join Norton Rose.
Martyr commented: "With the structure we have profit per equity partner doesn't make a great deal of sense, because we are running different models together. We have a variety of different profit profiles."
In the months leading to the official merger date, decisions will be made regarding practice group heads, global executive committee members and duplicate office space.
- Click here for more on the Norton Rose-Fulbright tie-up
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells & 10 Top Stories That Shaped Africa in 2024
4 minute readBig Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250