Herbert Smith Freehills shakes up post-merger partner notice terms
Herbert Smith Freehills is overhauling its notice period in the wake of the merger between the two firms which went live in October, with the new six-month term halving the notice period previously in place at legacy Herbert Smith. Partners at both firms approved the change, which is in the process of being implemented, as part of the merger terms. The six-month term, which will be imposed at the discretion of the firm, effectively doubles the notice for legacy Freehills partners exiting, as they were previously subject to just three months.
December 06, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
New partner exit rules set at six months for newly merged firm
Herbert Smith Freehills is overhauling its notice period in the wake of the merger between the two firms which went live in October, with the new six-month term halving the notice period previously in place at legacy Herbert Smith.
Partners at both firms approved the change, which is in the process of being implemented, as part of the merger terms. The six-month term, which will be imposed at the discretion of the firm, effectively doubles the notice for legacy Freehills partners exiting, as they were previously subject to just three months.
However, it halves the period for those at the legacy UK arm, which has been notorious for holding partners to tough exit terms. Notably, in 2007, it held real estate partner Chris de Pury to a 10-month notice period, with a further 12 months of restrictive covenants once he joined Berwin Leighton Paisner.
News of the overhaul follows a number of high-profile partner resignations from Herbert Smith in recent weeks, with senior litigation partner Kevin Lloyd set to join Debevoise & Plimpton, while corporate partner Will Pearce is exiting for Davis Polk & Wardwell.
It is understood Herbert Smith could still try to enforce a one-year notice period on these partners as they quit before the change was implemented.
A spokesperson said: "It was agreed as part of the merger that it made sense for partners at both firms to move from their existing notice periods to six months' notice. Partners in neither firm were on six months' notice prior to the merger."
One ex-Herbert Smith partner commented: "Keeping people out of the market for a year is outdated and goes back to a time when it would cripple a 30-lawyer practice for a partner to leave. Now that firms are so much bigger, it seems unnecessary. I also don't think it's a very good advert to clients for the firm to behave like that."
UK firms have increasingly been holding partners to notice in the wake of a string of high-profile hires by US firms, where in general partners are free to join their new firm immediately after handing in their notice.
Clifford Chance (CC) held former funds chief Jason Glover to a six-month notice period when he quit for Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, with some of the funds team subsequently quitting for Weil Gotshal & Manges also held to notice.
Meanwhile, Allen & Overy is expected to hold Stephen Jagusch to the majority of his nine-month notice period before he joins Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan early in 2013.
At the start of the year, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer also changed its exit terms for partners, increasing its notice period for those departing from three months to six. The decision came after the magic circle firm saw a number of partners leave for rival outfits, with corporate veteran Simon Witty joining Davis Polk's City arm in January and tax partner Jonathan Cooklin also joining the US firm in the summer.
The review of the Herbert Smith partnership deed has also seen the firm retain the threshold of equity partners required to back any move to exit a fellow member of the equity at 75% – a requirement which has been periodically reviewed at the firm.
Recent high-profile City departures from Herbert Smith
Dec 2012 Litigation partner Kevin Lloyd to Debevoise & Plimpton
Nov 2012 Corporate partner Will Pearce to Davis Polk & Wardwell
Sep 2012 Contentious regulatory partner Martyn Hopper to Linklaters
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman’s South African Lawyers in Last-minute Talks To Find Jobs Before Closure
3 minute readCMS Wistrand Hires Former Linklaters Nordics MP and Bird & Bird's Danish Hire
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250