Nixon Peabody to close Paris to focus on US
Nixon Peabody is set to close its Paris office, with the firm aiming to shift its focus to the US. The firm's Paris office currently has 11 partners, two of whom split their time with other offices, seven associates and a paralegal, according to Nixon Peabody's website. The team is headed up by office managing partner Douglas Glucroft. It is unclear where any of the Paris lawyers will go next.
December 19, 2012 at 12:23 PM
2 minute read
Nixon Peabody is set to close its Paris office, with the firm aiming to shift its focus to the US.
The firm's Paris office currently has 11 partners, two of whom split their time with other offices, seven associates and a paralegal, according to Nixon Peabody's website. The team is headed up by office managing partner Douglas Glucroft. It is unclear where any of the Paris lawyers will go next.
A spokesperson for the firm said: "Nixon Peabody is constantly focused on managing our business in the US and internationally to best serve the needs of our clients. With that as our priority, we are closing our Paris office, and will continue to serve our clients in France and Europe through our association with our Paris colleagues, the Terralex network, and other referral relationships."
In addition to Paris the firm's international operations include London, Shanghai and Hong Kong.
The Paris base launched in 2008 with 12 senior lawyers from Taylor Wessing who quit to start the base alongside Paris ex-managing partner Arnaud de Senilhes, who had left the UK firm earlier that year.
De Senilhes left Nixon Peabody in September to take up a position with Jeantet Associes, while finance specialist Jean-Norbert Pontier left in July for SNR Denton.
In 2008 Taylor Wessing's French arm filed a lawsuit against Nixon Peabody, accusing the US firm of colluding with de Senilhes to "raid" its partner ranks after merger talks between the two firms collapsed in 2007.
Taylor Wessing's legal team at Dreier, including name partner Marc Dreier, said Nixon's alleged attempts to poach 12 of Taylor's 15 non-equity French partners violated a 2007 agreement in which the firms promised not to recruit from each other for two years if merger talks fell through.
However the firm lost the battle after a trial judge ruled the US firm did not violate any laws, despite agreeing to a two-year moratorium on recruiting from Taylor Wessing in the wake of the failed talks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeaders at Top French Firms Anticipate Strong M&A Market in 2025 Despite Uncertainty
6 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readSimpson Thacher Becomes Second Firm to Launch in Luxembourg in 2 Days With A&O Shearman Hires
3 minute readHSF Hires Trio for Luxembourg Launch, Builds Private Capital Practice
Trending Stories
- 1NJ Managing Partner Survey Indicates Tougher 2024 for Many Law Firms
- 2Southwest Airlines Faces $100M Class Action Over Pay Periods
- 3Firms Saw Slight Declines From Last Year, but Merger Interest Remains High, Managing Partner Survey Reveals
- 4Medicaid Whistleblowers Awarded $37M Plus Interest
- 5Pfizer Faces Multiple Lawsuits Over Recalled Sickle-Cell Medication
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250