Nabarro LLPs show £486k top pay figure and £750k pension recovery plan
Nabarro's highest-paid partner took home £486,000 for the 2011-12 financial year, according to accounts recently filed with Companies House. The figure is marginally up on the top 2010-11 figure of £484,000, after a year in which the firm also saw increases in other key metrics.
January 14, 2013 at 07:07 AM
2 minute read
Nabarro's highest-paid partner took home £486,000 for the 2011-12 financial year, according to accounts recently filed with Companies House.
The figure is marginally up on the top 2010-11 figure of £484,000, after a year in which the firm also saw increases in other key metrics.
The accounts show profit for the financial year rose to £34m, up 17% on the previous year's figure of £29m. The amount billed to clients during the 12-month period reached £113m, marginally up on the previous year's figure of £112.5m. Nabarro last summer posted a 4.4% increase in profits per equity partner to £332,000, following a partnership review which saw 17 leave the equity.
The accounts also show that the firm, which runs a defined benefits scheme, will pay £750,000 a year to the scheme from 2012-13 to 2015-16, as part of a recovery plan to "eliminate the deficit for past service liabilities over a period of 15 years".
According to a spokesperson, the amount the firm contributes to the scheme is reviewed every three years, and similar contributions have been made for the past six years.
The sum, which is agreed with trustees and regulators, will address a projected deficit which has been affected by the impact of lower gilt yields, according to the firm. The deficit increased by £2m from £17.5m at the start of May 2011 to £19.5m by 30 April 2012.
The accounts also show that cash at the bank and in hand across the business totalled £8.2m in 2011-12, up from £6.9m the previous year. Meanwhile, total salaries dropped from £38.9m to £37.2m, with overall staff costs falling from £46.3m to £44.3m in the same period as staff numbers shrank 3% from 724 to 701. Fee earner headcount fell 4% to 347 from 360.
The accounts also show that the firm invested £587,000 as a subsidiary undertaking during the year, the details of which were undisclosed. According to the firm, the figure represents a historical investment in one of its service companies related to a profit-related pay scheme, which has no bearing on the consolidated accounts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250