Magic circle duo post marginal dips in spring NQ intake
Magic circle duo Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May have posted marginal drops in trainee retention rates for their spring intakes, posting figures of 85% and 86% respectively.
January 24, 2013 at 06:24 AM
3 minute read
Magic circle duo Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May have posted marginal drops in trainee retention rates for their spring intakes, posting figures of 85% and 86% respectively.
Freshfields awarded 40 positions to 46 of its February-qualifying lawyers, with all but one of those trainees electing to stay on, while 37 of Slaughters' 43 spring qualifiers have been offered a position.
Slaughters said 41 of the 43 trainees qualifying at the firm applied for positions, with 37 of those successful, adding that two others chose to pursue other careers.
While Slaughters' intake is down in percentage terms on last spring's intake, when 26 of the firm's 29 NQs were kept on by the firm, it has has taken on notably more lawyers in their round. The retention rate is just marginally down on Slaughters' September 2012 qualifying round, when the firm retained 42 of its 48-strong intake, resulting in an 87.5% retention rate. Two of the trainees also chose not to apply at the time.
Freshfields' retention rate is also slightly down on last September's intake, when 89% of its qualifiers were kept on. At the time, positions were offered to 43 of its 46 of its NQs, with 41 accepting.
That percentage was marginally down on the previous autumn's intake, when the firm kept on 48 out of 50 trainees.
Despite the slight drop, both Freshfields and Slaughters have posted two of the highest retention rates at top City firms in this round.
This week magic circle peer Allen & Overy said it had offered 38 of its 53 newly-qualified (NQ) lawyers a role, with 37 of these accepting, representing a retention rate of 70%, and a drop from 89% this time last year, when 51 of its 57 NQs were retained.
CMS Cameron McKenna posted a retention rate of 68%, with the firm keeping on 19 of its 28 qualifiers – its lowest result since autumn 2010. The figure compares with 81% in spring 2012 and 84% in autumn last year.
White & Case meanwhile offered 13 of its 14 qualifying trainees a job at the firm, 12 of whom accepted, resulting in an 86% rate. Other firms announcing their retention rates include Ashurst, which has posted a figure of 70% after keeping on 19 out of 27 NQs, and Weil Gotshal & Manges' City arm which is keeping on both of its newly-qualified lawyers. Elsewhere Nabarro posted a rate of 78%, keeping on seven of nine trainees offered a position at the firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250