Down but not out – global firms still eye Japan success despite a tidal wave of economic strife
When the Japanese Government allowed foreign law firms to open offices in the country in 1987 to provide international advice, UK and US advisers started piling onto the bustling streets of Tokyo, then lured by the presence of the world's biggest banks and insurance companies as well as its booming technology and automobile industries.
January 31, 2013 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
Tough conditions and expansive local rivals make Japan only for the committed, reports Elizabeth Broomhall
When the Japanese Government allowed foreign law firms to open offices in the country in 1987 to provide international advice, UK and US advisers started piling onto the bustling streets of Tokyo, then lured by the presence of the world's biggest banks and insurance companies as well as its booming technology and automobile industries.
But the boom was short-lived and by 1992, Japan had entered a full-stage recession, with share prices, GDP, real estate value and demand for Japanese products taking a nosedive.
Ever the optimists, many law firms continued to take advantage of further liberalisation in 1994, which allowed them to set up joint enterprises with domestic players to provide Japanese law advice, and in 2005, when it became possible for international and local firms to merge.
However, with the local economy declining over the past two decades, firms with offices in Japan have not had an easy ride, faced with limited domestic work and stiff competition from Japanese counterparts.
"Culturally, Japan is a very difficult market for a foreigner to survive in," said a legal recruiter based in Japan. "With the exception of Baker & McKenzie and Morrison & Foerster, most operations just haven't worked out and some have been disastrous.
"Japanese firms have proved to be much more worthy than [some international firms] expected, with some of the joint ventures slimmed out because the Japanese firms have just got bigger and stronger."
Slaughter and May pulled the plug on its venture in 1995, having opened in 1987, while Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton closed its local arm in 2006.
And those that have maintained their commitment to the region have come under continued pressure. Many have shrunk their Tokyo offices in recent years.
Linklaters, for example – which merged with local outfit Mitsui Yasuda Wani & Maeda in 2005 – saw eight lawyers leave at the end of 2011.
Allen & Overy (A&O) saw two bengoshi (advocates) corporate partners leave around the same time, with a number of bengoshi associates also understood to have left.
Even Clifford Chance (CC), which has the largest Tokyo offering of any magic circle firm – with about 50 lawyers, compared with around 26 at Linklaters and 21 at A&O – admits a slowdown in activity in the wake of the 2011 tsunami.
Jiro Toyokawa, a bengoshi partner at Bakers, says: "It has been a bad time for British firms. They are quite sensitive to profitability because most need to disclose the figures. Japan is quite an expensive place to do business. You have to hire highly educated bilingual staff, which is expensive."
But it has not all been bad news. While the domestic economy has continued to decline, government attention on outbound M&A against a strong yen has brought in a steady stream of international work.
With limited power supplies and a period of uncertainty in the energy sector following the 2011 tsunami, the country has also been eyeing large investments in energy projects in South East Asia.
Last November, Japanese group Tokyo Electric Power Company paid $1bn (£621m) for a stake in one of Australia's largest liquefied natural gas projects – the Chevron-backed Wheatstone Project – with A&O, White & Case and Australia's Allens scoring lead roles.
That same month, it emerged that A&O had also advised on Japanese pharma group Shionogi's purchase of a 10% stake in Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline's joint venture ViiV Healthcare.
As such, many of the big UK firms in Tokyo are focusing on project finance and corporate work (with some exceptions), while US firms tend to stick to US aspects of corporate, M&A and securities deals.
"Foreign firms [generally] fall into two groups: those seeking to practise local law and those who aren't," says David Sneider, the head of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's Tokyo office.
"Outbound investment by Japanese companies has been quite active in the past several years and I think a number of firms have benefited from that.
"There are also a number of success stories out there because people have found areas where they have good relationships and expertise, and they are able to get a steady flow of work."
Latham & Watkins Asia head David Miles (pictured, right) adds: "There are some very powerful local firms and no international firm is really going to penetrate that market.
"We have Japanese lawyers, but it isn't with the intention of taking on the local market because we don't see that as a smart thing to do. We are never going to win that battle.
"It's a very different market for international firms to operate in [compared with the rest of Asia] and I think if you're going to be there, you need to decide how."
Certainly, partners believe the market is more stable than in recent years, with some firms starting to hire again. Earlier this month, Bakers recruited Japanese-speaking registered foreign lawyer Kensaku Takase from Hogan Lovells to boost its intellectual property practice.
Last October, White & Case strengthened the English law side of its finance practice in Japan with the hire of Tim Jeffares from CC, who joined as of counsel.
In August 2012, Ashurst hired SNR Denton Moscow projects partner Myles Mantle as a counsel for its Tokyo branch, while in April, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer nabbed Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy Tokyo finance head Mark Plenderleith.
Tom Brown, the Asia managing partner for A&O, comments: "Where we've ended up, we have Japanese law capability and while this is incredibly important to our offering, it does not stand on its own to do just Japanese law transactions.
"This capability also complements what we do on the international side, particularly in relation to our strong outbound M&A and energy and project finance practices. It is working for us well."
CC Tokyo corporate partner Andrew Whan says he believes those already in Japan will now be there for the long term: "It's a really tough market, but CC is certainly here to stay, and I think a number of our English competitors have the same view.
"Japan is still the world's third largest economy, and the view of the majority of English firms is that it's a market they need to be in."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250