DWF and Cobbetts – how mooted merger became pre-pack takeover in just a year
From the moment Cobbetts last week confirmed plans to call in the administrators, it took little more than 24 hours for DWF to announce its intention to acquire the financially stricken firm in a pre-pack deal. The speed of the deal came as a surprise to many, despite the foundations set 12 months earlier by failed merger talks between the pair – a breakdown the firms attributed at the time to "continuing market uncertainty". But, with the UK economy teetering on the brink of a triple-dip recession, market conditions have hardly improved – so what has changed?
February 07, 2013 at 07:02 PM
6 minute read
Gerard Starkey looks at the background to the failure of Cobbetts – and how DWF picked up the pieces
From the moment Cobbetts last week confirmed plans to call in the administrators, it took little more than 24 hours for DWF to announce its intention to acquire the financially stricken firm in a pre-pack deal.
The speed of the deal came as a surprise to many, despite the foundations set 12 months earlier by failed merger talks between the pair – a breakdown the firms attributed at the time to "continuing market uncertainty".
But, with the UK economy teetering on the brink of a triple-dip recession, market conditions have hardly improved – so what has changed?
One former DWF partner told Legal Week he believed the real reason for the talks failing last year was resistance within DWF's partnership to taking on Cobbetts' £10m of debts, after the firm's 2010-11 accounts revealed the extent to which it was indebted to Lloyds TSB.
However, a year later, DWF's pre-pack deal should enable the firm to take on the profitable elements of Cobbetts' business without all the financial baggage thought to have scuppered last year's merger.
Four hundred and nineteen Cobbetts employees and partners will transfer to DWF after KPMG confirmed this week (6 February) that it had been appointed as administrator.
Walker Morris has taken on a 27-strong finance litigation team, while DWF's acquisition of Cobbetts also does not include Cobbetts' debt recovery team, Incasso, which has around 50 employees. In a statement, the firm said that it is "supporting those involved, including assisting in the day-to-day management of client affairs for the immediate future, whilst the long term direction of the business can be determined."
Last month Cobbetts signed a debenture with Lloyds TSB, effectively securing all its debt and future debt to the bank. This move is understood to put Lloyds first in line for any money recouped by a sale of the firm.
One former partner at DWF believes the two law firms and the bank could have been in negotiations over a tie-up for months.
"The fact that Lloyds took a debenture just weeks before suggests to me that this was a carefully orchestrated plan being carried out over a number of months. DWF would have needed time to seek internal approval from partners and the board, not to mention arranging the financing for a deal – there's no element of opportunism in this deal," the partner told Legal Week.
The process of transferring Cobbetts staff across to DWF is expected to start imminently.
According to Cobbetts, the final straw that led to last week's announcement was poor trading results during the final months of 2012.
However, it was well-known that the Manchester-based firm had been struggling for some time, with revenues falling almost 25% from a pre-recession high of £59.3m in 2007-08 to £45.2m last year.
Being a well-respected, lower mid-tier Manchester firm specialising in real estate and corporate, Cobbetts grasped the nettle during the boom time of the early 2000s and undertook a growth strategy aimed at competing with the developing national firms.
A senior partner at a northwest firm said: "Around 2003 Cobbetts decided to spread its wings but it all became rather problematic. It carried out a spree of acquisitions that never really took off and the [new office] deals also knocked it."
In 2003, Cobbetts added to its sole Manchester base with offices in London and Birmingham following tie-ups with Fox Brooks Marshall and Lee Crowder respectively. In 2004, the firm added Leeds capability after acquiring Walker Charlesworth & Foster.
But, despite a cull of 15% of its partnership in 2006, when the credit crunch arrived in 2007 Cobbetts found itself overly exposed to the faltering UK real estate market and burdened with debt accumulated during the mergers and the relocations to new premises in Leeds, Birmingham and Manchester.
"Cobbetts has always had a heavy real estate presence and real estate has been struggling in recent times – it goes to show the importance of having a balanced practice," said one Manchester-based partner.
Three redundancy rounds followed in as many months during 2008, affecting around 70 staff, half of whom were fee earners, in its three offices outside London.
In addition, the firm's transactional teams and support services staff were asked to work a four-day week for a 12-month period from May 2009, a move that saved thefirm £1.9m.
However, the DWF deal may not necessarily bring an end to the woe for all its near 500-strong staff. With DWF also present in the four cities in which Cobbetts resides, a duplication of roles is to be expected.
On announcing the Cobbetts agreement, DWF managing partner Andrew Leaitherland (pictured, top) said: "We will do all we can to make the integration as smooth as possible; however, as you'd expect in a move of this size, there are some areas of overlap and we may have to displace people or find them alternative roles."
With the Cobbetts deal coming swiftly on the back of DWF's takeover of professional indemnity firm Fishburns on 1 February, another major challenge immediately facing the fast-growing firm will be to integrate the new arrivals as swiftly as possible.
A senior partner with experience of law firm mergers cautioned: "I don't think there's a law firm in the country that can take on 170 people one week and follow that with 500 people the next – integration into one coherent unit will be a huge task and extremely costly."
Cobbetts – Five-year revenue overview
2007-08 – £59.3m
2008-09 – £48.5m
2009-10 – £43.8m
2010-11 – £44.5m
2011-12 – £45.2m
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250