Firms tackle debt conundrum as LLP accounts expose borrowing burden
Half of the UK's 20 largest law firms are carrying some degree of bank borrowing, limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts have revealed, as law firm debt comes increasingly into focus in the wake of the recent collapse of Cobbetts. Accounts filed with Companies House for the 2011-12 financial year show that 10 of the UK top 20 are carrying debts, with seven seeing their debt increase since the 2010-11 financial year: DLA Piper, Herbert Smith Freehills, Clyde & Co, Simmons & Simmons, Berwin Leighton Paisner, Irwin Mitchell and SJ Berwin.
February 14, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Accounts reveal debts as Cobbetts turns firms' focus to finances
Half of the UK's 20 largest law firms are carrying some degree of bank borrowing, limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts have revealed, as law firm debt comes increasingly into focus in the wake of the recent collapse of Cobbetts.
Accounts filed with Companies House for the 2011-12 financial year show that 10 of the UK top 20 are carrying debts, with seven seeing their debt increase since the 2010-11 financial year: DLA Piper, Herbert Smith Freehills, Clyde & Co, Simmons & Simmons, Berwin Leighton Paisner, Irwin Mitchell and SJ Berwin.
Herbert Smith's accounts show that it had net debt of £50m at the close of the 2011-12 financial year, up 22% on the previous year's figure of £41m. The figure equates to around 10% of the firm's annual turnover of £485m, and 40% of its £135m operating profit.
Clydes' LLP filing shows the firm had net debt of £38m at the end of 2011-12, equating to 13% of revenues and 55% of its operating profits of £69m.
Herbert Smith commented: "Our debt levels are in line with the operations of the firm, and structured to meet our specific requirements over a number of years. Clearly, we have been in a period of some expansion and the overall level of our debt is consistent with what we would expect at this point in our trading and investment cycle."
Clydes said its net debt had been increased marginally by the fact the accounts included just six-month's revenue contribution from legacy Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, but covered the full year's combined debt for both firms, which merged in November 2011.
Simmons reported net debt of £52m, a figure which equates to 98% of the firm's operating profit. However, the bulk of this (£48m) is revolving capital loans taken out by the firm instead of by individual partners to capitalise the business. If loans were reclassified as members' capital, net debt would stand at just £4m.
Firms improving their borrowing position during 2011-12 included Norton Rose, Bird & Bird, CMS Cameron McKenna, Addleshaw Goddard and Eversheds.
Cobbetts, which was last week taken over by DWF in a pre-pack deal, had loan and overdraft facilities of £10m with major creditor Lloyds TSB ahead of its demise, while Halliwells, which went into administration in 2010, had debts of around £22m in the months leading up to its collapse.
However, experts said debt is not necessarily indicative of financial problems. RBS head of legal services James Tsolakis (pictured) commented: "Measuring debt levels against revenue or operating profit in this way is relevant and interesting to a degree but not crucial in assessing a firm's financial position.
"Firms that excessively rely on overdrafts may encounter more difficulty than those firms utilising committed term facilities, as improving the firm's capital structure in this way allows debt to be more appropriately structured."
Outside the UK top 20, DAC Beachcroft saw net debt triple during 2011-12 to £34m, up from £10m the previous year, while Kennedys' borrowings almost doubled from £9.5m to £18.4m. Elsewhere, LG saw debts rise to £7.5m from £4.2m against revenues of £56m.
BDO head of professional services Nick Carter-Pegg added: "Banks have been tightening their lending to the legal sector generally over the past few years, going to back to Halliwells' collapse.
"Overall, firms are now better managed, having increased their focus on finances and having better management teams, including professional managers."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Law Firm of the Year: A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Managing Partner
5 minute readNew Year, New Ventures: 2025 Kicks Off with Mergers, Alliances, and Hidden Ambitions
5 minute readDentons Germany Elects First Gender-Balanced Leaders & Promotions at Noerr, Gleiss Lutz
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Week in Data Jan. 2: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 2Del. Chancery Claims Linking Fox Management to Defamation Liability Clear Hurdle
- 3Meet the Delaware Court of Chancery's First Senior Magistrate Judge
- 4Opening Statements: Striking While the Iron Is Hot
- 5Young Lawyers: 5 Ways We Could Manage Our Time Better in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250