Malaysia to open doors to global firms practising local law
Up to five international law firms could secure licences to enter the country later this year as Qualified Foreign Law Firms (QFLF) should the Legal Profession Amendment Act 2012 become law by summer as planned. According to the Malaysian Bar Council, successful firms will need to demonstrate international Islamic finance capacity in order to qualify for the QFLF licence, which will be valid for three years initially and will allow them to set up their own offices practicing in specific areas, excluding those such as family law and local litigation.
February 28, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Malaysia is gearing up to open its legal market to international law firms, with new legislation set to come into effect this summer.
Up to five international law firms could secure licences to enter the country later this year as Qualified Foreign Law Firms (QFLF) should the Legal Profession Amendment Act 2012 become law by summer as planned.
According to the Malaysian Bar Council, successful firms will need to demonstrate international Islamic finance capacity in order to qualify for the QFLF licence, which will be valid for three years initially and will allow them to set up their own offices practicing in specific areas, excluding those such as family law and local litigation.
The Act will also pave the way for overseas firms to form partnerships with local outfits, which would also be able to hire overseas lawyers.
Firms to have so far expressed an interest in Malaysia include Trowers & Hamlins, Allen & Overy, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith Freehills. Trowers, which last year opened a non-trading representative office in Kuala Lumpur, said it intended to apply for the QFLF licence, while the other firms are yet to confirm any concrete plans.
Commenting on the process, head of the Malaysian Bar Council Lim Chee Wee said: "The Bar is working closely with the Attorney General's chambers to finalise the rules and the selection committee guidelines, and we hope to have the law in force in the first half of this year and issue licenses shortly thereafter."
Lim also clarified that foreign lawyers, both licensed and unlicensed, will continue to be able to appear as counsel or arbitrators in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings in Malaysia, and will not be affected by the new laws.
Malaysia's decision to open up its legal market to overseas firms follows similar moves by authorities in Singapore and Korea in recent years, with Singapore last month handing out four additional licences to practice local law to international firms.
But it comes amid concerns about freedom within the Malaysian legal market after a local lawyer, Datuk VK Lingam, was charged with contempt in April last year for challenging a federal court decision. Lingam called on Conservative MP and One Brick Court barrister Sir Edward Garnier QC.
According to court documents, the application for Garnier to appear in the Malaysian courts on an ad hoc basis was dismissed on 10 January after suggestions that the country did not need to rely on the advice of "white" people.
Garnier has since appealed the refusal, while the contempt hearing itself is due to take place on 6 March. He said: "It will give law firms something to think about. It will be an additional factor for international law firms to consider when wondering whether to set up a presence in Malaysia."
Related: Links among just four firms to win Singapore licences after 23 apply
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Leaders Stress the Importance of the Rule of Law Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250