Retention rates at top 20 decline as economic climate pushes firms to cut back
Trainee retention rates across the bulk of the UK's largest law firms have fallen this year, with research by Legal Week finding the average rate has dropped by almost 10% on last spring's qualifying intake. At the top 20 UK firms with a spring intake, an average of 76.5% of newly qualified (NQ) lawyers have been kept on this year, 9% down on the equivalent intake last year and 3% lower than last autumn's qualifying round. Of 441 trainees at the firms to have released details to date, 343 have been kept on – down on the total of 358 of 422 NQs kept on across the same group in spring 2012.
February 28, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Leading UK firms post reduced retention figures as continued uncertainty prompts cautious recruitment
Trainee retention rates across the bulk of the UK's largest law firms have fallen this year, with research by Legal Week finding the average rate has dropped by almost 10% on last spring's qualifying intake.
At the top 20 UK firms with a spring intake, an average of 76.5% of newly qualified (NQ) lawyers have been kept on this year, 9% down on the equivalent intake last year and 3% lower than last autumn's qualifying round.
Of 441 trainees at the firms to have released details to date, 343 have been kept on – down on the total of 358 of 422 NQs kept on across the same group in spring 2012.
Clifford Chance was the only firm in the group to buck the downward trend after seeing retention figures for spring 2013 grow to 82% after keeping on 54 of 66 NQs, up from a retention rate of 76% recorded at the same point last year, and 77% in autumn 2012.
The magic circle firm recently confirmed that it is reducing the target number of graduate trainees across its 2015 intakes, with the new annual figure set at 100, down from a target of 120 in recent years.
The average retention rate of 81% across the five magic circle firms is slightly higher than the top 20 average, although down on the group's average of 86% recorded last spring.
Allen & Overy saw the largest decrease of the magic circle firms, with retention down from 89% to 70% this spring.
Other firms to have posted reduced retention rates in the latest qualifying round include Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP), which has seen rates drop from 88% last spring – when it took on 15 of its 17-strong intake – to 68% this year after 15 out of 22 NQs took up a position at the firm.
BLP graduate recruitment and trainee manager Claire England said: "Our retention rate has fallen in line with the majority of other law firms as we all operate in a challenging market. We make every effort to recruit the best future legal talent and to hire in line with our anticipated business need.
"We invest a lot in our trainees, so we are keen to keep on as many as possible to fit with our strategy. But at the same time, we are not distracted by the pursuit of high retention rates."
CMS Cameron McKenna also saw results dip significantly from 81% last year to 68% this year, with 19 out of 28 trainees taking a job at the firm.
DLA Piper, Eversheds, Clyde & Co, Bird & Bird and Irwin Mitchell do not have spring NQ intakes, while Pinsent Masons and Simmons & Simmons are set to confirm their spring 2013 retention figures next week.
The news comes after research by Chambers Student Guide found that retention rates at UK firms dipped last year for the first time since the height of the downturn. Of 2,620 trainees across 123 firms during 2012, 2,074 were kept on, equating to 79.1% – down on the 2011 figure of 80.5%.
———————————————————————————————————————————————-
Spring 2013 retention rates – magic circle
Clifford Chance: 54 of 66 NQs kept on – 82%
Linklaters: 49 of 59 NQs kept on – 83%
Allen & Overy: 37 of 53 NQs kept on – 70%
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: 39 of 46 NQs kept on – 85%
Slaughter and May: 37 of 43 NQs kept on – 86%
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Aviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Shoosmiths Hires Two Locke Lord London Partners as Part of a Six-Strong IP Team
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Fearless Forecaster’s Employment Law Predictions for 2025
- 2Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 3People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 4Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 5Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250