Betting on in-house – can corporate moves into legal services win credibility?
"At a time when in-house advisers are under growing pressure to demonstrate their worth to the wider business, why not try to leverage skills already housed within the department to make a profit from external clients or make new inroads where they know they have a ready made client base to serve?"
March 07, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
As news broke this week of yet more attempts at law firm consolidation, with Nabarro and Addleshaw Goddard admitting they recently discussed a tie-up that could have created a top 20 firm with revenues of more than £280m, it is not just private practice attempting to push through change.
Buoyed by the Legal Services Act, the in-house community is now getting in on the act. This week saw construction group Carillion and telecoms giant BT confirming plans to team up with their own external advisers to service clients alongside each other, and it seems unlikely they will be alone in their ventures.
In the case of Carillion, its partnership with Clarkslegal to provide employment law advice to businesses and individuals is unlikely to have many wider ramifications. But its decision last year to force panel firms such as Slaughter and May and Linklaters to channel low-cost commoditised work through Carillion's own legal services arm is likely to have a greater impact – not least on how firms look at using their own legal services centres or outsourcing agreements.
Similarly, BT Law's plans to partner with its panel firms to cross-sell its low-cost services to advisers' clients – and vice versa – marks both another shift in the dynamic between corporates and their law firms and the growing control they are exerting.
And why not? After all, at a time when in-house advisers are under growing pressure to demonstrate their worth to the wider business, why not try to leverage skills already housed within the department to make a profit from external clients or make new inroads where they know they have a ready made client base to serve?
However, it is not a strategy without its own challenges. These companies will need to win over rival corporates and convince them that not only do they possess comparable expertise as law firms, but that the advice they provide can be genuinely independent.
Both are areas where they could struggle. While forthcoming Legal Week research shows more than a third of corporates would consider setting up similar legal ventures of their own, far fewer would actually be willing to use such an offering by another company due to doubts over quality and independence. To give some indication of just how much convincing rival corporates will need, only 20% said they would be willing to try out such a venture, with a similar percentage determined that legal advice should come only from law firms.
But while it may not be an easy battle to change mindsets in the short term, there's no reason why it won't succeed in the longer term. The legal market has seen unprecedented change in recent years – and this is just the next step.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders in Brussels, Latin America and the US Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders in Brussels, Latin America and the US](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/03/Jones-Day-sign-01-767x633.jpg)
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders in Brussels, Latin America and the US
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![BCLP Joins Crowded Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices BCLP Joins Crowded Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/e6/fe/ab18116140d88533b3ff982cacac/bclp-cropped-767x633-1.jpg)
BCLP Joins Crowded Saudi Legal Market with Plans to Open Two Offices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250