Herbert Smith among trio of firms to win approval for Korea launches
Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) has become one of the latest three foreign law firms to receive approval from Korea's Ministry of Justice to open an office in Seoul, taking the total number of approved licence applications in the country to 16. HSF joins US firms Greenberg Traurig and McKenna Long & Aldridge winning licences, with the trio the first to be granted approval to launch so far this year, after DLA Piper was given the go-ahead to set up shop in December.
March 13, 2013 at 07:07 AM
4 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) has become one of the latest three foreign law firms to receive approval from Korea's Ministry of Justice to open an office in Seoul, taking the total number of approved licence applications in the country to 16.
HSF joins US firms Greenberg Traurig and McKenna Long & Aldridge winning licences, with the trio the first to be granted approval to launch so far this year, after DLA Piper was given the go-ahead to set up shop in December.
It means HSF, which in October said it would relocate four associates and two non-Korean partners to Seoul, including City dispute resolution and construction partner Tony Dymond and Singapore corporate partner Lewis McDonald, is the third British firm to secure a licence, alongside DLA and Clifford Chance (CC). It plans to formally open in Seoul in April, subject to visa approvals.
K&L Gates, O'Melveny & Myers and Covington & Burling were among a number of firms to last year receive approval from the Korean Ministry of Justice and the Korean Bar Association to open registered foreign law offices in the country, while CC, Ropes & Gray, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton were among the first to launch in the region.
The opening up of South Korea's legal market to foreign firms followed the ratification of a free trade agreement in February 2011, which said liberalisation would be rolled out in three stages.
From July 2011, EU-based law firms have been allowed to open representative offices in South Korea and to advise on non-Korean law, which has attracted a long list of applications from a variety of legal outfits.
The second stage of liberalisation will run from July this year, when firms will also be able to enter into co-operative agreements with Korean firms and advise on legal issues involving a mixture of domestic and foreign law. From July 2016, liberalisation will enter its third and final stage, permitting EU firms to invest in the local market and to recruit Korean lawyers.
Partners say many firms are drawn to the market by the raft of intellectual property (IP) and corporate opportunities.
"Firms want in on this IP litigation work… it's extremely lucrative," said Evan Jowers, the managing director of Asia legal recruitment company Kinney Recruiting, who has placed a number of Korean lawyers at US firms.
"The US firms have a particularly edge on this kind of work, because a lot of it takes place in the US. Aside from this, a number of these firms already had very strong Korea corporate practices based in Hong Kong. Other Korea groups are looking to build up M&A."
However, there are some concerns about the heightened competition for work and the impact this will have on fees. Some lawyers believe there will be some adjustments in the coming years.
"Considering the size of Korea… my guess is that there will be a restructuring period," said one partner. "I don't think all of those firms [who have secured licences] will stay on a long term basis."
Others say those looking at local tie-ups are likely to face fierce competition from local players, some of whom have been active in the market for more than four decades.
"The Korean market is not like any other market in Asia. It's even different from Japan where you've seen foreign law firms enter into the local practice," commented Yong Lee, the Korean practice head at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton.
"In Korea the largest law firms are huge. They've been here at least 40 years. They are extremely experienced and have extremely talented people. So I think there are very significant challenges for foreign law firms to compete."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Skadden to Close in Shanghai and Make Cuts to China Corporate Practice
Pinsent Masons Hires DLA Piper M&A Partner as Part of Growth Strategy
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250