Emerging Myanmar market draws attention as global law firms eye up latest Asian hope
After five decades of military rule which cut it off from much of the rest of the world, Myanmar, previously known as Burma, appears to be looking forward to a period of relative peace and prosperity. Following a series of far-reaching political reforms, which started opening up the resource-rich country in 2011, Myanmar – once known for its appalling human rights record, tyranny under military rule and media censorship – has seen US and EU sanctions eased, while interest from the international business community is mounting.
March 14, 2013 at 08:03 PM
6 minute read
Elizabeth Broomhall looks at the potential for Asia's biggest untapped market and what is holding firms back
After five decades of military rule which cut it off from much of the rest of the world, Myanmar, previously known as Burma, appears to be looking forward to a period of relative peace and prosperity.
Following a series of far-reaching political reforms, which started opening up the resource-rich country in 2011, Myanmar – once known for its appalling human rights record, tyranny under military rule and media censorship – has seen US and EU sanctions eased, while interest from the international business community is mounting.
The introduction of a new foreign investment law, allowing foreigners 100% ownership of their businesses, has been particularly significant. The new law, approved by President Thein Sein last November, also allows long land leases and options for tax relief.
Law firms say the new foreign investment regime, coupled with the country's strategic location between the fast developing economies of India and China, will be important in attracting spending by non-nationals, and in turn, their own attention. Equally significant will be Myanmar's wealth of natural resources and its urgent need for infrastructure development – not to mention its huge untapped domestic consumer market and its potential as a manufacturing hub.
Those to have already announced plans to enter the market include Singapore firm Rajah & Tann, Malaysia's ZICOlaw, Hong Kong outfit Charltons and US player Duane Morris Selvam. While Rajah & Tann has teamed up with local firm NK Legal to create the rebranded entity Rajah & Tann NK Legal, ZICOlaw has launched independently with a team of seconded and local lawyers.
Taking a similar approach is Duane Morris, which has a Myanmar team on the ground and is due to relocate one partner and one counsel from its network. It hopes to open for business in April with two offices: one in the current capital Naypyidaw and one in the commercial centre Yangon.
Firms potentially interested in opening or doing deals in the market include Herbert Smith Freehills, Allen & Overy, Hogan Lovells, Baker & McKenzie, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Watson Farley & Williams and Berwin Leighton Paisner – though none have plans to launch in the country yet.
Of the firms named, Bakers is probably the closest to an opening, with five local Myanmar lawyers being trained in Thailand to handle a mix of transactional, advisory and intellectual property (IP) work.
"The firm has been looking at Myanmar as an opportunity for the last 18 months," said Bangkok-based senior consultant Clive Cook (pictured).
"We currently have 14 offices in Asia and Myanmar is one of the last major untapped markets. It's certainly a jurisdiction where we will give active consideration to establishing an office, but we haven't made that decision yet.
"[Up until now] deals have been very stop-start; clients express interest, but it takes a long time for them to work out what to do. They're quite cautious and conservative, and the process is very slow. But it's now gathering momentum and the new foreign investment regulations definitely will help the position."
Christopher Osborne (pictured), a Thailand-based corporate partner at Watson Farley & Williams, also cites slow dealflow as a key reason for law firms holding back, as well as looming 2015 elections: "In the short term, I can't see many firms setting up there. [At the moment], we can happily service it from Singapore.
"In a perfect world, it would be good to have an office there, but it's a question of efficient allocation of resources and the amount of work you're going to have on an ongoing basis.
"We see a lot of investment standing on the sidelines, ready to go. But what's holding the investment back at the moment is the pace at which the relevant laws are being introduced."
Other problems include difficulties sourcing local talent. While there is a whole spectrum of different standards in relation to responsiveness and quality of advice, the market is visibly lacking lawyers with an international education, English-language skills and transactional experience.
"It's all still at the very preliminary stages," says Hong Kong corporate partner Michael Aldrich at Hogan Lovells, which plans to make a decision on whether to open in Myanmar in the next 12 months. "You have excellent IP lawyers in Myanmar, but there has been very little experience with corporate and finance work, largely because of the US and UN embargo."
Many partners, though, believe it is only a matter of time until law firms start entering the country in force, despite the challenges, with some anticipating that Myanmar's legal framework could overtake those of its regional counterparts.
Cook says: "The legal system, if updated, has the potential to leapfrog over some of Myanmar's Asian competitors because it has the framework at least to provide the rule of law, and is based upon the English law system, so is very familiar to Western investors.
"For most firms, initially they will be reliant on foreign clients. But there will be more work from the Burmese Government as it invests in infrastructure, and then there will be a number of Myanmar clients. Over time, that client base has significant potential."
———————————————————————————————————————–
MYANMAR – FAST FACTS
Population 54.5 million
Capital Naypyidaw
GDP $54bn (£36bn)
Proved crude oil reserves 50 million barrels
Proved natural gas reserves 283.2bn cubic metres
Labour force 33.41 million
Exports $8.529bn (£5.71bn)
Current opportunities Energy, mining, telecoms, infrastructure and manufacturing
Law market entry requirements Firms must hire local lawyers and get approval from Attorney General
All figures are 2012 estimates (based on CIA data)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllX-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Threat of Trump Tariffs Is Sign Canada Needs to Wean Off Reliance on Trade with U.S., Trade Lawyers Say
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250