Keystone Law to launch temp service for US firms
Keystone Law is moving into the temp lawyer market with a new service that will offer partner-level support to the City arms of US law firms. The new Law Firm Support service will enable firms to instruct Keystone's 120 lawyers to work on specific transactions and longer-term projects. This includes a guarantee from Keystone that no further instructions will be accepted by lawyers working for the client during the course of the temp assignment.
March 27, 2013 at 08:03 PM
2 minute read
Keystone Law is moving into the temp lawyer market with a new service that will offer partner-level support to the City arms of US law firms.
The new Law Firm Support service will enable firms to instruct Keystone's 120 lawyers to work on specific transactions and longer-term projects.
This includes a guarantee from Keystone that no further instructions will be accepted by lawyers working for the client during the course of the temp assignment.
It will primarily be aimed at the London offices of US firms, which may be under-resourced in some practice areas.
Keystone managing partner James Knight said: "When any firm instructs another, they need to be sure of two things. Firstly, that the work will be done properly and in accordance with the client's instructions, and secondly, that the client's loyalty will remain unaffected."
Keystone, which has to date recruited individual lawyers, is now aiming to attract teams of lawyers wanting more control over their own business. The firm, which operates with a core London team of around 20 support staff in addition to the lawyers on its books, allows its lawyers to work from home or their own offices and keep up to 75% of their billings on a 'paid as you earn' basis.
The new initiative would allow teams to break away from their existing firms and set up their own 'Keypods', while drawing on Keystone's support services.
Knight added: "This gives breakaway teams real freedom and autonomy, but within a fully supportive environment. Keypods can be up and running within a matter of days, with lawyers earning substantially more than previously and basically living the dream."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanadian Media Giants Sue OpenAI Over Alleged Copyright Violations in ChatGPT Training
3 minute readFormer Head of Finance at DLA Piper and Freshfields Quietly 'Struck Off'
2 minute readAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-CEO Michael Jeffries Sues Abercrombie, Claiming Company Must Cover Legal Fees in Sex Trafficking Case
- 2Alston & Bird Achieves Higher Rating for Medicare Advantage Insurance Companies
- 3This Year's Biggest Winners and Losers in UK Corporate Clients
- 4Freshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
- 5Jury Finds Dentons, Ex-Partner Beats Malpractice Claim Over $54 Million Currency Deal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250