Gender pay gap remains as female salaries lag male counterparts
Male lawyers are earning roughly a third more than their female counterparts despite a growing focus by law firms on gender diversity, according to a new Law Society study of 2012 pay levels. The research, which analysed pay data from 633 individuals working full-time in private practice, found the average salary for a qualified male lawyer of any level stood at £60,000 compared with £44,000 for women. The disparity increased with pay grade, with the top-earning quartile of all male lawyers surveyed paid at least £95,000 – 46% more than their female counterparts, who took home a minimum of £65,000.
April 11, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Pay gap widest among top earners as lawyers call for greater focus on supporting female career progression
Male lawyers are earning roughly a third more than their female counterparts despite a growing focus by law firms on gender diversity, according to a new Law Society study of 2012 pay levels.
The research, which analysed pay data from 633 individuals working full-time in private practice, found the average salary for a qualified male lawyer of any level stood at £60,000 compared with £44,000 for women.
The disparity increased with pay grade, with the top-earning quartile of all male lawyers surveyed paid at least £95,000 – 46% more than their female counterparts, who took home a minimum of £65,000.
Similarly, the gap widens further up the career level, with top-earning male equity partners (those in the top quartile) earning as much as 50% more than their female peers, taking home at least £150,000, compared with £100,000 for women.
The median earnings for male equity partners stood at £70,000 – 8% higher than the figure of £65,000 for women.
Ashurst finance partner Helen Burton (pictured, right) said: "It's a disparity that shows the lack of progression in the profession, and follows the fact there aren't enough senior female equity partners.
"While it's a depressing statistic, it's another reminder of the importance of pushing the progression of a female lawyer's career all the way up the ladder.
"It's not just about focusing on the percentage of women who enter partnership, as a lot of people do – we need to carry on supporting women as they advance through their career and ensure that our focus doesn't fall away."
In contrast, the gender gap is far smaller looking at the top ranks of salaried partners, with the upper percentiles of male and female salaried partners both bringing in around £100,000, although the median pay for male salaried partners of £70,000 is 40% higher than the corresponding female figure of £50,000.
Hogan Lovells disputes partner Ruth Grant (pictured, left) said: "These statistics raise the question of whether and, if so, why more women are staying in salaried roles instead of reaching the equity. This is something I know is regarded as a very live issue in the US and which is beginning to be explored more in the UK.
"There are various factors that may be relevant to why these differentials have emerged, such as different salary levels offered for different types of work and different levels of earnings at different firms, which, if more women are at firms that pay less or work in less well-paid areas of the law, may go against the notion that the figures reflect some form of direct discrimination.
"If this is the case, it raises interesting questions about the types of work the women questioned were doing, and where, and how that differed from their male peers."
The report also found average median earnings across all private practice grades have fallen by 3.6% on 2008 levels, down from £55,000 to £53,000. Equity partners have seen the sharpest decrease since the credit crunch, with median drawings down 18% from £85,185 in 2008 to £70,000 in 2012.
The Law Society's 2008 study, which found that male solicitors at the time earned on average £19,000 more than their female colleagues, prompted the society to launch a two-year equal pay campaign in collaboration with the Association of Women Solicitors.
In 2011, Eversheds became the first law firm to sign up to a gender reporting initiative launched by the Government, which sees businesses encouraged to report on issues including variances between male and female pay.
A number of other major firms including Allen & Overy, Linklaters and Hogan Lovells have since joined the initiative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250