Bird & Bird plans further Asia-Pac expansion as firm eyes Indonesia and Korea
Bird & Bird is mulling ambitious plans for further expansion in Asia, with openings in Indonesia and South Korea on the cards alongside plans to ramp up its existing offering in Malaysia. The UK outfit, which has previously stated its aim to grow its Asia practice to account for 20% of firmwide revenues and lawyer headcount over the next three to five years, is reviewing opportunities for co-operation arrangements in Indonesia and South Korea, as well as planning to enhance its partnership with Tay & Partners in Malaysia ahead of market liberalisation in June.
April 18, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Firm mulls further co-operation agreements as part of plans to grow Asia revenue to 20% of firmwide total
Bird & Bird is mulling ambitious plans for further expansion in Asia, with openings in Indonesia and South Korea on the cards alongside plans to ramp up its existing offering in Malaysia.
The UK outfit, which has previously stated its aim to grow its Asia practice to account for 20% of firmwide revenues and lawyer headcount over the next three to five years, is reviewing opportunities for co-operation arrangements in Indonesia and South Korea, as well as planning to enhance its partnership with Tay & Partners in Malaysia ahead of market liberalisation in June.
It wants to target lucrative intellectual property (IP) and technology-related work in South Korea, while in Indonesia it hopes to grow its capabilities beyond IP into energy and corporate work.
In Malaysia, it wants to add to its existing capabilities by relocating partners from other Asian offices, and to focus on knowledge transfer and joint marketing in preparation for the opening up of the market to the international legal community later this year.
News of the plans comes weeks after Bird & Bird signed a co-operation agreement with Sydney law firm Truman Hoyle, which it hopes to extend to a full merger within the next 12 months.
In the short term, the two firms are also focusing on joint marketing initiatives and growth through lateral hires, with an opening in Melbourne also under consideration, as the city is perceived as a hub for Australian IP work.
Justin Walkey, Bird & Bird's China executive committee chairman, who relocated to Hong Kong in October, said the non-exclusive co-operation agreements allow the firm to try out joint working arrangements before pushing for a full merger.
The long-term plan is for the firm to have a network of offices around Asia-Pacific with the same core practice focus as its bases within Europe, where it recently struck partnerships in Denmark and Switzerland.
Its Danish merger with Bender von Haller Dragsted will go live on 1 May, while it entered into a co-operation agreement with Swiss firm BCCC Avocats earlier this month.
"Ultimately, the objective is that either through co-ops or best-friend relationships, we have a properly joined-up service offering that covers the whole of Asia-Pacific," said Walkey.
"[In Australia] there were one or two very large firms looking for tie-ups, but they were too big for us. We looked at what other people had done, and the Clifford Chance model looked like it was working well."
Forthcoming hires within Bird & Bird's own offices in Asia could include a TMT specialist in Singapore and IP and aviation experts in Hong Kong, in addition to a corporate team in Shanghai. The firm is also considering boosting its litigation and arbitration capabilities.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Leaders Stress the Importance of the Rule of Law Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Trending Stories
- 1Newsmakers: Former Pioneer Natural Resources Counsel Joins Bracewell’s Dallas Office
- 2Quiet Retirement Meets Resounding Win: Quinn Emanuel Name Partner Kathleen Sullivan's Vimeo Victory
- 3Avoiding the Great Gen AI Wrecking Ball: Ignore AI’s Transformative Power at Your Own Risk
- 4A Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors Amid the Tragedy of the LA Fires
- 5Change Is Coming in the Trump Era. For Big Law, Change Is Already Here
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250