Lessons of the new world – why brutal markets mean there is no room for error
As law firm collapses go, Cobbetts has neither the partner infighting of Halliwells nor the sheer scale and alleged top-level mismanagement of Dewey & LeBoeuf to generate popular appeal. What Cobbetts does provide, though – far more so than the more extreme examples above – is a salient lesson to all law firms about how quickly and easily things can go wrong in today's ever-uncertain economic climate.
April 25, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
As law firm collapses go, Cobbetts has neither the partner infighting of Halliwells nor the sheer scale and alleged top-level mismanagement of Dewey & LeBoeuf to generate popular appeal.
What Cobbetts does provide, though – far more so than the more extreme examples above – is a salient lesson to all law firms about how quickly and easily things can go wrong in today's ever-uncertain economic climate.
Of course, like Halliwells, much of the problem for Cobbetts lay with some bold property decisions that would ultimately destroy it – at £74m, Cobbetts' lease liabilities made up more than 80% of its total liabilities at the time of its collapse.
But as numerous firms can testify, it is an easy mistake to make. After all, not everyone gets as lucky as Norton Rose believes it did on its More London deal. As such, there are plenty of examples out there of firms signing new office deals at the wrong point in the market and then going on to struggle to sub-let an ever-increasing amount of unwanted space.
Similarly, Cobbetts is not alone in failing to predict how long the impact of Lehman's collapse would be felt and therefore failing to restructure its business accordingly away from transactional practices.
While many of the largest firms have taken action to bulk up in other areas such as disputes and regulatory work, there are plenty of others – particularly in the squeezed mid-tier – that would probably concede they have not yet moved far enough in this direction.
None of this is to say that Cobbetts' management team did not make mistakes, because they clearly did – including, arguably, not taking decisive enough action to control costs and borrowings, and failing to find a merger partner before the problems became insurmountable.
But in any other market, these mistakes would have been unlikely to have cost the firm its existence. Today's reality, though, means that nearly five years after Lehman's collapse caused the global markets to implode, the still brutal economic climate means there is little room for error any more. And especially not on issues as expensive as property.
In comparison to other industries, the legal market has remained relatively resilient – buoyant in some instances even, if some firms' predictions of double-digit growth for the current financial year are proved true.
But as the small – yet growing – list of law firm casualties demonstrates, it is not entirely immune from risk. And with the new world order proving less forgiving, bad decisions that firms could, in the past, have come back from may now prove fatal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/07/CITGO-Headquarters-767x633.jpg)
Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
![Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/04/New-York-767x633.jpg)
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
![Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/07/Singapore-Dollars-767x633-1.jpg)
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
![A&O Shearman Hires Ashurst's Head of Restructuring for Italy A&O Shearman Hires Ashurst's Head of Restructuring for Italy](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/09/Paolo-Manganelli-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250