Resistance to criminal Bar reforms escalate as protests disrupt northern courts
The chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has appealed to the public to back protests against Government reforms of criminal advocacy, following an all-day meeting of Northern Circuit barristers this week that led to disruption at courts in the north of the UK. The Northern Circuit of the Bar met in Manchester on Monday (22 April, pictured top) to address the Ministry of Justice's (MoJ) plans to introduce price-competitive tendering (PCT) for legal aid contracts, which could see criminal work awarded to the lowest bidder regardless of expertise.
April 25, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Controversial QASA grading system for advocates and plans to open up work to tender face growing objections
The chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has appealed to the public to back protests against Government reforms of criminal advocacy, following an all-day meeting of Northern Circuit barristers this week that led to disruption at courts in the north of the UK.
The Northern Circuit of the Bar met in Manchester on Monday (22 April, pictured top) to address the Ministry of Justice's (MoJ) plans to introduce price-competitive tendering (PCT) for legal aid contracts, which could see criminal work awarded to the lowest bidder regardless of expertise.
The move comes alongside the introd-uction of the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), a controversial new grading system set to be rolled out this year which will see criminal advocates rated at one of four levels.
The reforms have prompted concerns over the future of the independent criminal Bar, while many high street law firms are expected to be hit hard as legal aid contracts are likely to be absorbed by volume providers due to the PCT changes.
CBA chair Michael Turner QC said: "We hope the public are sympathetic. Under QASA and PCT, the object is to limit the choice of who will be representing you – this could be your life on the line and you would have no choice over who was defending you. Democracy is being abolished.
"The independent Bar will disappear – 1,600 firms will be cut to 400 and the huge providers will take over. Your provider will end up being a Tesco or Eddie Stobart employee. This can't be in the public's best interest."
Some 400 barristers and QCs of the Northern Circuit were at the meeting on Monday, with HM Courts & Tribunals Service confirming that, of the 241 cases originally listed for that day, 15 trials and 42 other matters were adjourned, with the majority given new dates within four weeks.
John Cooper QC (pictured) of 25 Bedford Row commented: "The meeting is a statement to the Government reflecting the anger of the criminal Bar. The Government will play dirty – they will try to paint the Bar as a group of 'fat cat' lawyers. If the public want to take the bait, they will. But it is up to us to lay down what the issues are."
Resistance to the implementation of QASA and PCT has grown in recent weeks, with this meeting coming shortly after the resignation of Jonathan Kinnear QC from the Bar Standards Board (BSB) professional conduct committee in protest over the introduction of QASA, which he described as "disastrous".
A BSB spokesperson said: "The reasons cited for Monday's action are misconstrued. Arguments about competitive tendering for legal aid contracts are related to the recent Ministry of Justice Consultation on Legal Aid, whereas QASA exists to protect the public from those advocates who are not as good as they should be. The two are not linked.
"Recent changes to regulation have led to a new breed of companies licensed to provide legal services that may seek to take over criminal barristers' work if the opportunity presents itself. However, the Bar Standards Board is working to help barristers adapt their business models so as to continue to provide excellent advocacy in the emerging legal landscape."
Fountain Court's Patricia Robertson QC, vice chair of the BSB, warned: "Other circuits organised their meetings outside of court hours. Clients still need their representation. The public may become less sympathetic to the Bar if they are seen to be putting their own interests ahead of their clients."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Freshfields Takes on Syria's Brutal Legacy, But Will Victims Ever See Compensation?
5 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readCanadian Appeal Court Rules Thumbs-Up Emoji Can Constitute a Contract Agreement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250