Weil Gotshal's London arm rolls out range of alternative billing methods
Weil Gotshal & Manges' City arm has introduced a menu of alternative billing methods as part of a push to offer its clients better value for money. The US firm's London office has been actively promoting the use of alternative billing to its partnership since last summer, with private equity partner Marco Compagnoni and funds partner Ed Gander leading the initiative and drawing up a list of 15 options for partners to use
April 25, 2013 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Firm introduces 15 options to offer clients better value for money
Weil Gotshal & Manges' City arm has introduced a menu of alternative billing methods as part of a push to offer its clients better value for money.
The US firm's London office has been actively promoting the use of alternative billing to its partnership since last summer, with private equity partner Marco Compagnoni (pictured) and funds partner Ed Gander leading the initiative and drawing up a list of 15 options for partners to use.
The billing choices are part of an effort to move away from traditional hourly rates and offer clients a range of prices for different aspects of a transaction, as well as bundled deals and retainers.
Compagnoni said: "A lot of firms often talk about alternative billing, but there is never much other than offering discounts on standard rates. We wanted to move away from that sort of plain vanilla option and come up with smarter ways of working.
"It's not a prescriptive menu. It's simply an internal set of scenarios and options for partners to think about using, and aims to give them more confidence in using those ideas."
Weil London managing partner Mike Francies added: "A large number of our clients subscribe to at least one type of alternative arrangement. We're also being more systematic about secondments, supporting back offices, training and dissemination of know-how and market practices."
Several other major City firms have rolled out alternative billing initiatives in recent years, including Olswang and CMS Cameron McKenna, while support for the traditional hourly billing model has been falling in recent years.
A recent Legal Week survey of 1,204 companies found 50% favoured fixed fees, with just 11% supporting hourly billing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG Law US Targets Alternative Business Licence, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
3 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute readOgletree Deakins Launches Office in Calgary, Canada With Two Partners From McCarthy Tétrault
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1‘Not a Regulatory Gray Area’: CFTC Secures $5M Settlement From Gemini
- 2Proskauer, Cleary, O’Melveny, Sidley Add Laterals, as New Year Opens with Movement
- 3Justice Department Enters Consent Decree With Fulton County Over Jail Conditions
- 4Baker & Hostetler Appoints New Office Leaders in Philadelphia, Chicago
- 5Which Courts Are Open and Closed in Florida?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250