Fear of cyber crime rise as nearly 80% believe their firm could be hit by web hack
Law firm managers are becoming increasingly concerned about the likelihood of their firm being subject to a cyber attack, according to new research from Legal Week. A Legal Week Benchmarker survey – which canvassed the views of more than 370 partners, IT directors, chief information officers (CIOs) and other senior managers – found almost 80% of respondents believed that their firm is likely to be the subject of cyber attacks, while nearly two fifths (38%) believe that the number of cyber attacks is on the rise.
May 02, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Legal Week Intelligence report reveals growing worries about threat of online crime among law firms
Law firm managers are becoming increasingly concerned about the likelihood of their firm being subject to a cyber attack, according to new research from Legal Week.
A Legal Week Benchmarker survey – which canvassed the views of more than 370 partners, IT directors, chief information officers (CIOs) and other senior managers – found almost 80% of respondents believed that their firm is likely to be the subject of cyber attacks, while nearly two fifths (38%) believe that the number of cyber attacks is on the rise.
The research findings, in association with digital risk experts Stroz Friedberg, are backed up by the Law Society, which is working with Government bodies including the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills to establish a cyber security consultancy, which will provide practical support to law firms.
The society last month held a cyber security briefing for City law firms on the actions they need to take to protect themselves. DLA Piper CIO Daniel Pollick said: "There has been a change in atmosphere in the past 18 months. Governments are taking cyber security more seriously and are pushing it to the top of business agendas."
More than a third (36%) of respondents expressed a belief that their firm's systems could withstand attacks. DLA Piper is investing a seven-figure sum in a programme to combat cyber threats, which includes both technical and human elements.
Legal Week's study also found more than two-thirds of respondents (68%) think the law is an attractive target sector for cyber criminals, although only one in eight (12%) believe their firm has been attacked to date. Almost two-thirds (62%) think that other members of their organisation now take the threat of cyber attacks seriously.
Janet Day, director of IT at Berwin Leighton Paisner, said: "The market is becoming more alert to the increase in cyber-criminal activity – and is becoming more mindful of it. The threat profile has got bigger as our population becomes more sophisticated."
The survey also revealed that law firms lag behind the rest of the commercial world in terms of estimating costs associated with IT threats, with only 9% having worked out potential costs, compared to 26% in businesses outside the legal sector.
Day added: "It varies from firm to firm. Some organisations are well prepared to deal with threats, but I don't agree that firms lag behind. Most have done work on this."
The survey found that fewer than a third (31%) of people working in law firms believe that their top management fully understands the issues around cyber security.
Day commented: "While top management should be aware of what a cyber threat is, it should not necessarily be their role to deal with it, but the person they designate."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts, Lawyers Press On With Business as SoCal Wildfires Rage
- 2Florida, a Political Epicenter, Is the Site of Brownstein Hyatt's 13th Office
- 3Law Firms Close Southern California Offices Amid Devastating Wildfires
- 4Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 5Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250