Wragges to outsource staff and cut up to 30 jobs in support restructuring
Wragge & Co is to cut up to 30 full-time equivalent roles in a back office restructuring that will see the firm outsource support functions to business process outsourcing (BPO) company Intelligent Office. The news was announced to staff by managing partner Ian Metcalfe yesterday (7 May) and comes after a comprehensive review of the firm's back office, which was launched at the start of the year.
May 08, 2013 at 08:02 AM
3 minute read
Wragge & Co is to cut up to 30 full-time equivalent roles in a back office restructuring that will see the firm outsource support functions to business process outsourcing (BPO) company Intelligent Office.
The news was announced to staff by managing partner Ian Metcalfe yesterday (7 May) and comes after a comprehensive review of the firm's back office, which was launched at the start of the year.
Around 180 PAs, concierge and document production staff in London and Birmingham have been placed at risk, with the firm currently in the process of identifying those it wishes to retain, with up to 30 full-time equivalent roles expected to be cut.
Following the consultation, the remaining PAs will continue as employees of Wragges; however, those retaining roles within the concierge and document production teams will be placed in a TUPE consultation before being transferred to Intelligent Office.
In addition, the firm has also placed 28 employees from the front-office, document management resourcing and archiving teams in a TUPE consultation. It is expected that the three teams will also transfer to Intelligent Office.
According to the firm, the new structure will see the PA role become more focused on clients, business development and project managing the demands from partners and fee earners.
Meanwhile, there will be Intelligent Office-managed document production centres and concierge hubs in each of the four legal groups of real estate, human resources, dispute resolutions and corporate, commercial, finance and projects.
Wragges expects to have concluded the redundancies and have the new structure in place by the end of October.
Managing partner Ian Metcalfe said: "Clients expect their lawyers to deliver excellent advice in the most efficient way. Our people want roles in which they can develop and which offer career opportunities. Having taken a good look at our current model we have identified a number of ways in which we can improve both efficiency and opportunity.
"Neither I nor the board have made these decisions lightly but we feel they are in the best long-term interests of our business. We have to change how we operate if we are to remain competitive without compromising quality. This is going to be a difficult time for the people involved but we will run fair and open consultation processes, respond to questions and minimise uncertainty."
The news comes after Bevan Brittan transferred 72 support roles to Intelligent Office in a similar move in late 2011. However, three months later, around 15 staff were made redundant by the BPO company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readWeil Acquires More Office Space as HSF, Simmons Eye New London Bases
2 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Trending Stories
- 1From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 3Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 4Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 5Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250