Freshfields holds associate and trainee pay bands at 2012 rates
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has announced details of its 2013 associate salaries - holding rates at 2012 levels as the magic circle firm becomes the third to reveal junior lawyer pay this year. Despite the rates remaining broadly the same as last year, junior lawyers at Freshfields will still be able to take home the same or more than their magic circle peers. Trainee salaries remain at £39,000 for first year recruits and £44,000 for those in their second year, marking the fifth year they have stuck at this rate. Meanwhile, the foundation stage in the magic circle firm's 'milestone' pay bands - which were introduced last year and replace the previous system of pay based on number of years of post-qualification experience (PQE) - remains in the range of £65,000 to £72,500. This band is largely equivalent to newly-qualified (NQ) and one year PQE lawyers.
May 10, 2013 at 10:43 AM
3 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has announced details of its 2013 associate salaries – holding rates at 2012 levels as the magic circle firm becomes the third to reveal junior lawyer pay this year.
Despite the rates remaining broadly the same as last year, junior lawyers at Freshfields will still be able to take home the same or more than their magic circle peers.
Trainee salaries remain at £39,000 for first year recruits and £44,000 for those in their second year, marking the fifth year they have stuck at this rate.
Meanwhile, the foundation stage in the magic circle firm's 'milestone' pay bands – which were introduced last year and replace the previous system of pay based on number of years of post-qualification experience (PQE) – remains in the range of £65,000 to £72,500. This band is largely equivalent to newly-qualified (NQ) and one year PQE lawyers.
Level one salaries, which capture the majority of lawyers with between two and four years' PQE, meanwhile range from £80,000 to £92,500. Level two, which typically covers those with more than four years' PQE, remains at £100,000 to £107,500.
Milestone three lawyer's pay starts at £115,000 with no upper limit. Lawyers in this band typically have around six years' PQE.
The firm is in the process of conducting associate appraisals to determine where each will sit within the bands. Bonuses are determined by assessing individual performance and contribution as well as the financial performance of the London office and individual practice groups.
Nigel Rawding (pictured), Freshfields' London people partner said: "We remain committed to our strategy to promote a high performance culture which recognises and incentivises individual development rather than tenure; and we have invested heavily in our career milestones structure. Attracting and retaining the very best people is about much more than remuneration however and we also continue to focus on ensuring our all people have excellent opportunities for development through training and application."
Earlier this week, Linklaters unveiled across-the-board increases in its junior salary bands, with NQs seeing the biggest pay rise with an extra £2,500 on last year. Slaughter and May meanwhile announced slight increases in pay earlier this month, with trainee salaries starting at £39,000 and NQs paid £63,000.
Associate salaries: How the magic circle compare
Freshfields 2013 salary bands
Trainee year 1 – £39,000
Trainee year 2 – £44,000
CMF (equivalent to newly-qualified to one year PQE) £65,000 – £72,500
CM1 (two to four years' PQE) £80,000 – £92,500
CM2 (four years' plus PQE) £100,000 – £107,500
CM3 (roughly six years' PQE) from £115,000
Linklaters 2013 junior pay bands (2012 in brackets):
Trainees year 1: £39,500 (£39,000)
NQ: £64,000 (£61,500)
One year PQE: £69,500 (£69,000)
Two years' PQE: £78,250 (£76,000)
Three years' PQE: £89,000 (£88,000)
Slaughter and May 2013 junior pay bands (2012 in brackets):
Trainee year 1: £39,000 (£38,000)
Trainee year 2: £44,000 (£43,000)
NQ: £63,000 (£61,500)
One year PQE: £69,500 (£69,000)
Two years' PQE: £78,000 (£76,500)
Three years' PQE: £87,500 (£86,000)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Knowledge Management in 2025
- 2Fenwick Shutters Shanghai Office
- 3Litigators of the (Past) Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Am Law 50's Head Count 'Holding Pattern' Could Trickle Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250