CC and Linklaters lead as BP and Shell face price fixing investigation
Clifford Chance (CC) and Linklaters have scooped key mandates for Shell and BP, as the oil majors face investigation by the European Commission over allegations of oil and biofuel price fixing. The Commission made a series of unannounced office inspections at companies, including BP, Shell, Statoil and oil pricing agency Platts on Tuesday (14 May), amid concerns the companies may have violated European antitrust rules over cartels and abuse of dominant market position.
May 16, 2013 at 07:22 AM
2 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) and Linklaters have scooped key mandates for Shell and BP, as the oil majors face investigation by the European Commission over allegations of oil and biofuel price fixing.
The Commission made a series of unannounced office inspections at companies, including BP, Shell, Statoil and oil pricing agency Platts on Tuesday (14 May), amid concerns the companies may have violated European antitrust rules over cartels and abuse of dominant market position.
Shell general counsel Peter Rees QC confirmed that the oil giant has instructed CC global competition head Oliver Bretz and London-based competition partner Alastair Mordaunt to advise on the matter.
Meanwhile Linklaters' competition team is understood to be advising long-term client BP in relation to the investigation. Last year the firm advised BP on its multibillion-dollar sale of Russian oil joint venture TNK-BP to Rosneft.
None of the companies were mentioned by name in the Commission's announcement but all have confirmed that they are cooperating with authorities.
The Commission's statement said the organisation had "concerns that the companies may have colluded in reporting distorted prices to a Price Reporting Agency (PRA) to manipulate the published prices for a number of oil and biofuel products". It stressed that the inspections do not mean that the companies are guilty of anti-competitive behaviour and are not a judgement on the investigation's outcome.
PRAs set benchmarks for the trade of oil in the physical and financial derivative markets in Europe and globally. Small distortions of assessed prices can have a huge impact on the price of crude oil, refined oil products and biofuels purchases and sales.
There are no legal deadlines to complete inquiries into anticompetitive conduct, but the length of the investigation is likely to hinge on the complexity, the cooperation of the companies, and the exercise of rights of defence.
Separately, Shell is currently informing firms of the result of its review of external legal advisers, with between two and five firms expected to receive appointments per practice area in each jurisdiction.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalmart Ordered to End ‘Abusive Practices’ By Mexican Antitrust Authority
O'Melveny Secures Global Clearances as Korean Air-Asiana Merger is Finally Completed
Big Law Firms Help Vodafone-Three Merger Clear Major Competition Hurdle
Canada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250