Law firms missing out on SME work over cost concerns, LSB study finds
More than half of small businesses are handling their own legal matters amid widespread concerns about the value for money offered by law firms, according to a major Legal Services Board (LSB) research project. The report, compiled in partnership with pollsters YouGov, surveyed 9,703 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in England and Wales, with 52% of respondents stating that they handle legal problems without external help.
May 21, 2013 at 07:07 PM
3 minute read
More than half of small businesses are handling their own legal matters amid widespread concerns about the value for money offered by law firms, according to a major Legal Services Board (LSB) research project.
The report, compiled in partnership with pollsters YouGov, surveyed 9,703 small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in England and Wales, with 52% of respondents stating that they handle legal problems without external help.
Only 13% of respondents to the survey believed that lawyers offer a cost-effective method of resolving legal issues, despite more than one third (38%) acknowledging that they had faced a significant legal problem over the last 12 months, of which almost half (45%) resulted in a negative financial impact.
Knights Solicitors managing partner David Beech (pictured) commented: "SMEs view lawyers as being too costly because of hourly rates and inefficient processes, which repeatedly reinvent the same wheel at too much cost and do not properly take into account the commercial value to an SME. Law firms need to charge what clients want to pay rather that what the clock says – they have to find cost effective ways of delivering the same services for less."
The report valued the average cost of each legal problem at £6,700, which, when extrapolated across all small businesses in the UK, means SMEs are losing more than £100bn per year as a result. Only 5% of the businesses surveyed employed an in-house legal expert.
Keystone Law managing partner James Knight said: "In our experience many SMEs lack a relationship of trust with a commercially minded solicitor who they can turn to at short notice to receive succinct advice on an ad hoc basis. This is unfortunate since a legal adviser can remain hidden in the background whilst helping to resolve a dispute quickly and amicably. A bit of strategic advice at the planning stage can help ensure a dispute never arises in the first place."
The LSB – the independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of legal services in England and Wales – hopes the report will act as an incentive for law firms to develop and deliver better service offerings for the 4.7 million small businesses in the UK, while also challenging regulatory bodies to remove unnecessary regulation which is hindering innovation.
LSB strategy director Crispin Passmore said: "Seven out of eight consumers say lawyers aren't offering a cost effective way to resolve problems, so it appears law firms aren't doing as good a job as they could be doing. We need to have more choice and a more competitive market and this research is aimed at helping firms help themselves.
"This is about a pattern of change – removing unnecessary regulation and red tape to increase access to justice and ensure legal services can be better targeted and delivered more cost efficiently to small business."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSetting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute readNetflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250