Five ways businesses can maximise their IP value
Intellectual property is a valuable asset for many businesses, but often this value is not recognised. Simon Crossley and Ben Jones of Eversheds explain how companies can make the most of their IP credentials...
May 30, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Simon Crossley and Ben Jones explain how companies can make the most of their IP credentials
Intellectual property is a valuable asset for many businesses, but often this value is not recognised. Businesses should actively manage their IP to maximise its value and should consider a number of common areas as part of the management process.
IP rights are essential to developing and protecting market share and existing profits, as well as to prevent or restrict competition. But this is a passive role that does not directly generate measurable profit or value for a business.
Consequently, much IP, particularly where generated internally, is not fully recognised on companies' balance sheets and is not considered to be a profit centre for a business, even though it is essential to such business.
However, through a proper understanding of the value of IP and active management of such IP, this otherwise passive asset can be made to work harder, generating profit and other additional value while still performing its primary role. In this economic environment, using existing and valuable assets of a business to their fullest extent is essential – and IP assets are no different.
Set out below are a number of areas on which businesses should focus when seeking to maximise the value of their IP.
Clearly identify IP assets
Identifying the full value of IP to a business requires a detailed understanding of the nature and scope of the relevant IP rights and the protection available for such rights. Only with this information can an accurate value be attributed to such IP. Accurately valuing IP is vital to:
- demonstrate the full value of a business to a potential purchaser;
- attract investment or raise finance; and
- focus strategic direction and appropriate allocation of resources.
Maximise tax incentives
Many jurisdictions have specific tax incentives targeted at IP and the development of IP, such as research and development tax credit systems and low-tax regimes for IP-generated profits (for example, profits derived from patents).
This is a fast developing area, with new incentives being introduced and the benefits of existing incentives increasing as part of the international competition between jurisdictions seeking to attract high-tech and IP-reliant businesses.
Consequently, now more than ever, IP-related tax incentives can have real value. But this constant development also means businesses are often unaware of new incentives or do not fully maximise the benefits of available incentives. Businesses should ensure that they are making the most of any such available tax incentives.
Centralise IP
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250