New Korea disputes centre attracts London, Hong Kong and Singapore tenants
Hong Kong and Singapore's international arbitration centres are among a group of institutions which have launched in Korea this week with the opening of the new Seoul International Dispute Resolution Centre (IDRC). The Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), which are currently competing to become the first choice for arbitration hearings in Asia, have each opened offices in the new campus alongside the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB).
May 30, 2013 at 05:42 AM
3 minute read
Hong Kong and Singapore's international arbitration centres are among a group of institutions which have launched in Korea this week with the opening of the new Seoul International Dispute Resolution Centre (IDRC).
The Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), which are currently competing to become the first choice for arbitration hearings in Asia, have each opened offices in the new campus alongside the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB).
The Seoul IDRC, which is located in the Seoul Global Tower Building in the city's central business district, is hoping to attract hearings from across Asia and boost the country's profile as a venue for alternative dispute resolution.
Both HKIAC and SIAC are hoping to enhance relationships with users of arbitration services in Korea and Japan following a surge in hearings from companies and individuals in those markets.
SIAC's decision to open in South Korea follows the launch of a representative office in Mumbai in April, with the centre also hoping to launch a fourth base in the Middle East in the near future.
HKIAC currently has just one branch in Hong Kong, but with representatives working full time in Latin America and mainland China to promote Hong Kong and the HKIAC in those regions.
Leading SIAC's Korean office will be counsel Julia Yu, while HKIAC's base will temporarily be overseen by James Chun, a Korean counsel in Hong Kong.
In the first year, the Seoul IDRC expects to accommodate around 15 arbitrations, and a total of up to 200 hearings within the next five years. Officials say the economic impact of each case is expected to be around $2m.
"Seoul is geographically located at the crossroads between three major economic powers – the US, Japan and China – and there is a great potential for becoming a crucial dispute resolution venue for international disputes between parties of these countries," said a spokesperson.
"Although only four arbitral institutions are planning to open offices at the Seoul IDRC at this time, there are plans to expand the facilities to allow offices of other major international arbitral institutions such as the ICC and the ICDR."
They added: "Positioning Korea as an arbitration hub will stimulate people's interest in the growth of international arbitration as well as improve the quality of legal services.
"We also expect an indirect economical effect by becoming a leading jurisdiction for international arbitration, with many arbitrators visiting Seoul and foreign law firms establishing offices to help vitalise the market."
The opening of Seoul IDRC was supported by the Seoul City Government, the Korean Bar Association, the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board and the Ministry of Justice.
It will be managed by a board of directors including lawyers from local firms Kim & Chang, Bae Kim & Lee, Shin & Kim and Lee & Ko, as well as the Seoul National University and Ministry of Justice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250