Linklaters is today (10 June) facing an employment tribunal claim brought against the firm by a former paralegal.

The hearing, which is taking place in the London Central tribunal, has been brought against the firm by former paralegal Ali Hussain.

Hussain, who joined Linklaters on a temporary paralegal contract in 2009 and was offered a fixed term position in May 2011, has brought an allegation of bullying and harrassment against his former employer and former manager Hasan Bayat.

His claims include allegations that he was pressured to work overtime, a lack of support and that he was picked on for being an Asian Muslim, although some other witness statements given so far at the hearing do not support his claims. Hussain made his first complaint to Linklaters' HR team in April 2012.

Hussain is also making allegations of fraudulent billing practices at Linklaters; however, this will be examined in detail later on in the case.

Linklaters has turned to Lewis Silkin for advice, with Amy Sander of Essex Court Chambers instructed as counsel. Hussain is relying on JMW Solicitors for advice, with Kashif Ali of St Johns Buildings representing him during the hearing.

The hearing was initially due to start this morning before employment judge Mr D Pearl, alongside members Mrs CI Ihnatowicz and Mr AB Grant; however, it was delayed until later this afternoon. According to tribunal details, the hearing is expected to last for six days.

Linklaters declined to comment.

Last month (16 May) Travers Smith lost a tribunal claim for pregnancy discrimination brought against it by a former trainee, Katie Tantum, after she failed to secure a permanent role at the firm after becoming pregnant during her final seat 

Tantum instructed law firm Leigh Day to launch the case in February after failing to gain a newly-qualified position in Travers' real estate department.

The Central London Employment Tribunal found that Travers' evidence relating to the discussions concerning Tantum's qualification was "implausible" and that the firm was "prepared to discriminate because of pregnancy". A financial settlement was reached last week. Details were undisclosed.