Chartered accountants hit back at Law Society's probate criticism
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has issued a strong riposte to criticism from the Law Society over its plans to become a probate licensing body. ICAEW professional standards director Vernon Soare has rebutted the Law Society's claims that the ICAEW's application to license probate services fails to address issues of regulatory oversight, the complexity of probate, and how clearly the public would understand its complaints process.
June 27, 2013 at 06:11 AM
2 minute read
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has issued a strong riposte to criticism from the Law Society over its plans to become a probate licensing body.
ICAEW professional standards director Vernon Soare has rebutted the Law Society's claims that the body's application to license probate services fails to address issues of regulatory oversight, the complexity of probate, and how clearly the public would understand its complaints process.
Writing to the Legal Services Board chief executive Chris Kenny, Soare (pictured) said that the Law Society's observations are "inconsistent with the objectives of the [Legal Services] Act or are disproportionate to the relevant consumer and public risk".
Soare rebutted concerns that the institute would not be wholly separate from the probate regulatory function. He said that an ICAEW probate committee, with a majority of lay members, would be accountable to the Legal Services Board, not the institute.
Some of his strongest words were reserved for the society's concerns about professional self-interest overcoming the public interest.
"In contrast" to the legal profession, Soare noted, the "primacy" of public interest has been written into the 1880 founding ICAEW charter and has characterised member conduct ever since.
"This is not a new concept introduced by the Legal Services Act but something built into the DNA of the accounting profession for over a century," he said in the letter.
The institute also pointed out that it was "rather irregular" for the Law Society to choose to comment on the ICAEW consultation after the period to respond had passed.
Soare's letter also covered the society's concerns on issues around professional indemnity insurance, accountants' ability to manage the probate process, practice assurance reviews, and consumer rights.
A version of this article first appeared on Accountacy Age. Click here to view the ICAEW's full response, and here for a roundup of the Law Society's concerns.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden to Close in Shanghai and Make Cuts to China Corporate Practice
DWF Group's Canadian Firm Set to Add Fourth Office With 16-Lawyer Montreal Team
UK Law Firms Face £75M Money Laundering Investigations Alongside Russia Scrutiny
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250