Firms clear to advise in Malaysia without local bases as 'fly-in, fly-out' gets OK
International law firms doing business in Malaysia will be able to advise clients without having to set up an office in the country, as details emerge of new legislation set to open up the country's legal market this summer. Malaysian authorities had been expected to restrict firms from doing business in the country on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis, preventing firms from advising clients on the ground without an office in the country. However, revised regulations, which will be debated by parliament next month, say law firms without Malaysian offices will still be able to advise clients in the country, provided their stay does not exceed 60 days per lawyer, per year.
June 27, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
International firms welcome unexpected development as Malaysia eases requirements for market entrants
International law firms doing business in Malaysia will be able to advise clients without having to set up an office in the country, as details emerge of new legislation set to open up the country's legal market this summer.
Malaysian authorities had been expected to restrict firms from doing business in the country on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis, preventing firms from advising clients on the ground without an office in the country.
However, revised regulations, which will be debated by parliament next month, say law firms without Malaysian offices will still be able to advise clients in the country, provided their stay does not exceed 60 days per lawyer, per year.
The news comes after a first set of amendments to the Legal Profession Act were passed by the former parliament in July last year, setting out new rules for allowing foreign law firms to open a local base in the country.
When in force, they will permit five firms to launch a Malaysian office as Qualified Foreign Law Firms (QFLF), and others through joint law ventures with local outfits.
"We sat down with the Attorney General's chambers a few months ago and we both agreed to [further] amend the Legal Profession Act to provide for fly-in, fly-out [work]," said the Malaysian Bar Council's new president, Christopher Leong.
Leong expects the amendments to come into force by the end of July, after the first session of parliament.
The authorities have also clarified the rules on foreign lawyers entering the country for arbitrations.
According to the latest bill, foreign lawyers seeking to appear as counsel in international and domestic arbitrations taking place in Malaysia will be permitted to enter the country at any time and with no limit on the duration of their stay.
However, the criteria for those who wish to enter the country as QFLFs is understood to remain the same, with firms required to have a strong Islamic finance practice, Leong said.
The liberalisation of Malaysia's legal market follows similar moves by authorities in Singapore and Korea in recent years, with Singapore handing out four additional licences for foreign firms to practise local law in February.
The decision not to ban 'fly-in, fly-out' will be welcomed by international law firms, many of which are currently servicing the market from Singapore.
Those outfits that have so far expressed an interest in Malaysia include Allen & Overy, Norton Rose Fulbright, Herbert Smith Freehills and Trowers & Hamlins.
Trowers, which last year opened a non-trading representative office in Kuala Lumpur, said it intended to apply for the QFLF licence, while the other firms were yet to confirm any concrete plans.
Norton Rose Fulbright Southeast Asia head Jeff Smith said the firm was still considering its options. "We are looking quite carefully at whether to open an office. We've got a good business there, and clients we have worked with for decades, so it would be good to be closer to those clients," he said.
"Certainly the ability to fly in and fly out is helpful generally. It's important that Malaysian corporates have access to their chosen law firm, so the additional choice and competition afforded by allowing lawyers to fly in and out must be in their interests."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250